How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Embedding determinant formula
Statement
Let be the distinct embeddings . For every ordered -basis of , and the determinant is nonzero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An ordered basis of the number field.
In a separable extension, trace is the sum over the embeddings (Norm and trace from embeddings, with the inseparable exponent in the norm formula).
Distinct field embeddings are linearly independent as characters (Dedekind's linear independence theorem for distinct characters).
Proof
With , [F1] gives for the trace Gram matrix.
If were singular, a nonzero linear combination of its rows would vanish on the basis and hence on every element of , contradicting [F2]. Thus .
Taking determinants in step 1.1 gives , and step 1.2 gives the asserted nonvanishing.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Milne, Proposition 2.26 (standard reference, not scraped)