How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Signed discriminant of a cyclotomic field
Statement
Let be a reduced index, that is is odd or , and let for a primitive -th root of unity . Then the signed field discriminant is the product being over the primes dividing ; for one has . The conductor theorem later identifies the reduced index with the intrinsic conductor of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A reduced index and a primitive -th root of unity in a fixed algebraic closure of , with and . In the main case , write with pairwise distinct primes and , put and , and for put and .
has ring of integers with the power basis as an integral basis, and (Prime-power cyclotomic ring, discriminant support and p factor).
Coprime-discriminant compositum: for number fields with and , the ring of integers satisfies and (Integral basis and discriminant of a coprime-discriminant compositum).
For every , and is an integral basis (Ring of integers of every cyclotomic field); the discriminant of an order is independent of the chosen integral basis, so it may be computed from this basis (Discriminant of a basis and order, Power-basis and polynomial discriminants).
inside the fixed algebraic closure, with : this is the compositum identity together with irreducibility of the cyclotomic polynomials and multiplicativity of on coprime arguments (, is irreducible in for every , Euler's totient is multiplicative: implies for positive , The cyclotomic extension as a splitting field of ).
For an ordered -basis of a number field with distinct embeddings one has and the determinant is nonzero (Embedding determinant formula).
A real number that is a root of unity is , of multiplicative order or (The group of -th roots of unity in a field, and primitive -th roots of unity). The signature of a number field satisfies (Archimedean embeddings and signature).
Proof
In the main case , each is at least : if is odd this is clear, and if then because is reduced, so . Hence each has degree , and by multiplicativity of on the coprime factors .
For every the power-basis computation of [F1] gives with , and the p_i-adic exponent of the claimed formula is .
The field has no real embedding: if for an embedding , then is a root of unity whose order is exactly , because if and only if if and only if ; but by [F6] a real root of unity has order or , a contradiction. Hence , complex conjugation acts on the embeddings as a fixed-point-free involution, and by [F6].
In the separate case from the Statement with , one has , and [F3] gives the integral basis of . Its trace Gram matrix is the matrix , so its determinant is ; by the discriminant definition in [F3], .
By induction on , : for , and the exponent is ; for , [F4] gives and with , the discriminants and are coprime because one is a product of powers of and the other is , and [F2] then gives .
With respect to the integral basis of [F3], the determinant of [F5] is nonzero and . Complex conjugation permutes the index set of the embeddings by a product of transpositions by step 1.3, so and therefore ; since , the sign of is .
Taking absolute values in the induction of step 2.1 with and using and gives .
Combining the sign of step 2.2 with the absolute value of step 3.1 gives for the given reduced index ; the separate case has by step 1.4. These are the cases in the Statement.
Remarks
- Sign and absolute value are computed separately. The absolute value comes from the prime-power absolute discriminants and the coprime-discriminant compositum formula; the sign comes from the pairing of complex embeddings. Neither the different ideal nor its positive norm is used.
- Reduced index. For an unreduced index with odd one has , and the formula must be applied to the reduced index ; the statements of this pair therefore exclude .
Depends on
- Ring of integers of every cyclotomic field
- Prime-power cyclotomic ring, discriminant support and p factor
- Integral basis and discriminant of a coprime-discriminant compositum
- Power-basis and polynomial discriminants
- Embedding determinant formula
- Discriminant of a basis and order
- $K(\mu_m)K(\mu_n)=K(\mu_{\operatorname{lcm}(m,n)})$
- $\Phi_n$ is irreducible in $\mathbb Q[t]$ for every $n\ge1$
- Euler's totient is multiplicative: $\gcd(m,n)=1$ implies $\varphi(mn)=\varphi(m)\varphi(n)$ for positive $m,n$
- The cyclotomic extension $K(\mu_n)$ as a splitting field of $t^{n}-1$
- The group $\mu_n(K)$ of $n$-th roots of unity in a field, and primitive $n$-th roots of unity
- Archimedean embeddings and signature
Used by
- Arithmetic of Q(zeta₅) Example
- Prime decomposition in Q(zeta₁2) Example
- Prime decomposition in Q(zeta₈) Example
Dependency tree · two levels
81 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Number Theory, Remark 6.6(c) and Proposition 6.2(d) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Conrad-Landesman, Math 154 Algebraic Number Theory, Theorem 11.6 and Remark 11.7 (standard reference, not scraped)