How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite separable integral closures over normal Noetherian domains are module-finite
Statement
Let be a Noetherian integrally closed domain with fraction field , let be a finite separable field extension, and let be the integral closure of in . Then is a finite -module.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Noetherian integrally closed domain with fraction field , a finite separable extension , and the integral closure of in .
The fraction field is obtained by inverting the nonzero elements of the domain (The field of fractions of an integral domain).
Being integrally closed means that every element of integral over already lies in (Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains).
The trace pairing is nondegenerate for a finite separable extension (The trace pairing in a finite separable extension is nondegenerate).
Proof
Choose an -basis of . For each , choose a monic polynomial for over and one nonzero denominator clearing all of its coefficients. Then for suitable , so is integral over and therefore lies in . Replacing each by preserves the -basis, so we may assume from the start that . By [L1], there is a trace-dual basis with . Clearing denominators in the coordinates of the relative to the basis , choose such that for every .
Let , and write with . The dual-basis relation gives and therefore . Because and lie in , their product is integral over . The field trace of an integral element is a finite sum of its conjugates, hence is integral over , and it lies in ; therefore [F2] forces . Hence every coefficient lies in .
Step 2.1 shows that . Multiplication by identifies this containing module with the finitely generated module , so it is finite over . Since is an -submodule of a finite module and is Noetherian, is finite over .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mircea Mustata, Introduction to Commutative Algebra, §8.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 15.22.11 (standard reference, not scraped)