Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite separable integral closures over normal Noetherian domains are module-finite

Statement

Let R be a Noetherian integrally closed domain with fraction field F=Frac(R), let L/F be a finite separable field extension, and let A be the integral closure of R in L. Then A is a finite R-module.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Noetherian integrally closed domain R with fraction field F, a finite separable extension L/F, and the integral closure A of R in L.

[F1]

The fraction field is obtained by inverting the nonzero elements of the domain R (The field of fractions Frac(D)=(D{0})1D of an integral domain).

[F2]

Being integrally closed means that every element of F integral over R already lies in R (Integral closure in an extension ring and integrally closed domains).

[L1]

The trace pairing (x,y)TrL/F(xy) is nondegenerate for a finite separable extension (The trace pairing in a finite separable extension is nondegenerate).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Choose an F-basis e1,,en of L. For each i, choose a monic polynomial for ei over F and one nonzero denominator diR clearing all of its coefficients. Then (diei)m+dicm1(diei)m1++dimc0=0 for suitable cjF, so diei is integral over R and therefore lies in A. Replacing each ei by diei preserves the F-basis, so we may assume from the start that e1,,enA. By [L1], there is a trace-dual basis e1,,en with TrL/F(eiej)=δij. Clearing denominators in the coordinates of the ej relative to the basis ei, choose 0cR such that cejiReiA for every j.

F1L1givenchoose
2.1

Let xA, and write x=iaiei with aiF. The dual-basis relation gives aj=TrL/F(xej) and therefore caj=TrL/F(xcej). Because x and cej lie in A, their product is integral over R. The field trace of an integral element is a finite sum of its conjugates, hence is integral over R, and it lies in F; therefore [F2] forces cajR. Hence every coefficient aj lies in c1R.

F2step 1.1algebra
3.1

Step 2.1 shows that Ac1(Re1++Ren). Multiplication by c identifies this containing module with the finitely generated module Re1++Ren, so it is finite over R. Since A is an R-submodule of a finite module and R is Noetherian, A is finite over R.

step 1.1step 2.1given

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources