How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Pell Equations and Generalized Pell Orbits — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Pell Equations and Generalized Pell Orbits
- Regular Continued Fractions and Diophantine Approximation
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
2 · Summary
These examples keep the parity rule, the fundamental-unit classification, and the generalized-orbit bounds concrete. They show both the small classical cases and the two seam warnings fixed by the design: generalized Pell solutions need not be convergents, and the explicit order need not contain every unit of the larger quadratic order.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The Pell and negative Pell equations for
Example
For one has Hence so the negative Pell equation has least positive solution , while the fundamental Pell solution is
The first positive Pell solutions are therefore
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The positive nonsquare integer .
Negative Pell is soluble exactly for odd period length, and when the period length is odd the least positive negative-Pell solution is while the least positive norm-one solution is (Negative Pell is soluble exactly for odd period length).
Every positive Pell solution is a unique positive power of the fundamental unit (All positive Pell solutions are powers of the fundamental solution).
Verification
A direct continued-fraction calculation gives , so the period length is . Fact [F1] therefore gives the least positive negative-Pell solution hence , and the least positive norm-one solution hence .
By [F2], every positive Pell solution for is a power of . Multiplying out the first powers gives
The Pell equation for
Example
For one finds so the period length is even. The least positive solution of is and the negative Pell equation has no integral solution.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The positive nonsquare integer .
Negative Pell is soluble exactly for odd period length, and when the period length is even the convergent is the least positive norm-one solution (Negative Pell is soluble exactly for odd period length).
Verification
A direct continued-fraction calculation gives , so the period length is . Then [F1] gives the least positive norm-one solution at hence , with
Because the period length is even, [F1] also says that has no integral solution.
The negative Pell equation for
Example
For one has So the negative Pell equation has least positive solution and squaring it gives the fundamental positive solution
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The positive nonsquare integer .
Negative Pell is soluble exactly for odd period length, and in that case the least positive negative-Pell solution is while the least positive norm-one solution is (Negative Pell is soluble exactly for odd period length).
Verification
A direct continued-fraction calculation gives , so . Fact [F1] therefore gives the least positive negative-Pell solution that is, , and indeed
Squaring the negative-Pell solution yields and By [F1], this is the least positive norm-one solution.
The Pell equation for
Example
The complete quotients of are
so The convergent is the first one with norm , so the fundamental Pell solution is
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The positive nonsquare integer .
The continued fraction of has symmetric period ending in , and the returned state satisfies (The continued fraction of has symmetric period ending in ).
The convergents of satisfy (Convergents to satisfy the norm identity).
Verification
Starting from , rationalizing reciprocals gives the state cycle so the digits are and The convergents are therefore
Here and , in agreement with [F1]. Applying [F2] at gives so is the least positive norm-one solution.
The large fundamental solution for
Example
A direct continued-fraction calculation gives
so the period length is . The least positive solution of is and the least positive solution of is its square
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The positive nonsquare integer .
Negative Pell is soluble exactly for odd period length, and when the period length is odd the least positive negative-Pell solution is while the least positive norm-one solution is (Negative Pell is soluble exactly for odd period length).
Verification
The displayed continued fraction has odd period length . Running the convergent recurrence through one full period gives Fact [F1] therefore gives so is the least positive negative-Pell solution.
Squaring that element gives and therefore By [F1], this is the least positive solution of Pell's equation for . The example shows that a finite continued-fraction algorithm can still produce a very large fundamental solution.
Generalized Pell orbits for
Example
For the bounded representatives are exactly and every integral solution is
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The equation .
Every positive Pell solution is a power of the fundamental unit (All positive Pell solutions are powers of the fundamental solution).
Every generalized Pell solution is Pell-equivalent to one in the explicit bounded rectangle given by the orbit theorem (Generalized Pell solutions fall into finitely many Pell orbits).
Verification
The element has norm , and there is no positive norm-one solution with because is impossible; hence is the fundamental Pell unit, so [F1] identifies the Pell powers with . The element has norm . For and , the bound of [F2] is
The only integer solutions in that box are . Moreover, so and lie in the same Pell orbit, and multiplying by gives the negative orbit. Therefore every solution of is
Bounded representatives for
Example
For the orbit bound reduces the search to the finite box Inside that box the solutions are
Thus every integral solution lies in one of the eight Pell orbits represented by
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The equation .
Every solution is Pell-equivalent to one in an explicit bounded rectangle (Generalized Pell solutions fall into finitely many Pell orbits).
The bounded-rectangle search decides solubility and produces orbit representatives (Generalized Pell solubility is decidable by bounded search).
Verification
The least positive norm-one solution for is , since and the smaller positive values give , neither a square. Substituting and into [F1] gives
By [F2], it is enough to enumerate solutions in that finite box. The integer solutions there are exactly and , because and no other pair with , satisfies the equation. To compare their Pell orbits, note that every nonzero power of has absolute value either at least or at most . But among the eight displayed solutions, every quotient of two distinct positive representatives has absolute value between and this interval lies strictly inside . So no ratio of two distinct displayed solutions is a power of , and negative ratios are impossible because every power of is positive. Therefore these eight boxed solutions represent eight distinct Pell orbits.
A generalized Pell solution need not be a convergent
Statement refuted
Every integral solution of a generalized Pell equation is a convergent of .
Witness
The element solves but the rational number is not a convergent of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The generalized Pell solution .
If a reduced rational number satisfies then is a convergent of (Legendre's criterion for convergents).
Counterexample
One checks directly that so is a generalized Pell solution. A direct continued-fraction calculation gives whose convergents begin Thus is not a convergent of .
The missing hypothesis is exactly the small-error bound in [F1]: here so [F1] does not apply. Therefore generalized Pell solutions need not all be convergents.
The elementary Pell order can miss units from the larger quadratic order
Statement refuted
Every unit of a quadratic order containing already lies in the explicit Pell order .
Witness
Take . The larger explicit order contains the unit but .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The explicit Pell order from The norm on the explicit order .
The explicit Pell order consists exactly of the elements with (The norm on the explicit order ).
Counterexample
The element is a unit in because
If lay in , then [F1] would give integers with Comparing coefficients of and yields and , impossible in . So is a unit of the larger quadratic order that is not in .