How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A generalized Pell solution need not be a convergent
Statement refuted
Every integral solution of a generalized Pell equation is a convergent of .
Witness
The element solves but the rational number is not a convergent of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The generalized Pell solution .
If a reduced rational number satisfies then is a convergent of (Legendre's criterion for convergents).
Counterexample
One checks directly that so is a generalized Pell solution. A direct continued-fraction calculation gives whose convergents begin Thus is not a convergent of .
The missing hypothesis is exactly the small-error bound in [F1]: here so [F1] does not apply. Therefore generalized Pell solutions need not all be convergents.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, Pell's Equation, I (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peter Hackman, Elementary Number Theory (standard reference, not scraped)