Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Legendre's criterion for convergents

Statement

Let α be an irrational real number. If r,s∈Z satisfy s>0, gcd⁡(r,s)=1, and ∣α−rs∣<12s2, then r/s is a convergent of α.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An irrational real number α with convergents pn/qn, and a reduced rational number r/s with s>0.

[F1]

The convergent denominators satisfy q0=1, q1=a1≥1, and qn+1=an+1qn+qn−1 with an+1≥1. Hence they are strictly increasing from q1 onward. Moreover qn+2≥qn+1+qn≥qn+1, so they are unbounded (Convergents of a regular continued fraction).

[F2]

For n≥1, the contrapositive of the best-approximation theorem says that if s<qn+1, then ∣sα−r∣≥∣qnα−pn∣. (Convergents are best rational approximations of the first kind).

[F3]

For an irrational α, the first complete quotient is defined and α=a0+1α1,α1>a1=q1. (Complete quotients in the continued-fraction algorithm).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F3givenalgebra

First suppose s<q1. By [F3]. [F3, given, algebra] 0<α−a0=1α1<1q1≤12. If r/s≠a0, then ∣r−sa0∣≥1. Since the integers satisfy q1≥s+1, the reverse triangle inequality gives ∣α−rs∣≥∣rs−a0∣−∣α−a0∣>1s−1q1≥1s−1s+1=1s(s+1)≥12s2, contrary to the hypothesis. Hence r/s=a0=p0/q0 is the zeroth convergent.

1.2F1given

It remains to suppose q1≤s. Since the denominators are unbounded. [F1, given] and strictly increase from q1 onward, [F1] gives an index n≥1 with qn≤s<qn+1.

2.1step 1.2F2givenalgebra

Assume r/s≠pn/qn. Since s<qn+1, [F2] and the hypothesis give. [step 1.2, F2, given, algebra] ∣qnα−pn∣≤∣sα−r∣<12s.

3.1step 2.1givenalgebra∎

Since rqn−spn is a nonzero integer when r/s≠pn/qn, one has. [step 2.1, given, algebra] 1≤∣rqn−spn∣=sqn∣rs−pnqn∣. Using the triangle inequality and step 2.1, ∣rqn−spn∣≤qn∣r−sα∣+s∣qnα−pn∣≤(qn+s)∣sα−r∣<qn+s2s≤1, a contradiction. Therefore r/s=pn/qn, so r/s is a convergent.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources