Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Number Fields Rings of Integers and Discriminants — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The examples calculate integral bases and discriminants while keeping the index of a power order explicit. The pure-cubic entry records that a squarefree-discriminant maximality certificate is unavailable there; no nonmonogenic field is asserted without a complete source.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Integers of Q

Example

OQ=Z and dQ=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A rational number a/b in lowest terms.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1given

Its monic minimal polynomial is X−a/b, integral only when b=1.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

The basis (1) has trace Gram determinant 1.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Gaussian and Eisenstein integral bases

Example

OQ(i)=Z[i], d=−4; and OQ(−3)=Z[(1+−3)/2], d=−3.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The quadratic integer and discriminant formulas (Integers in a quadratic field, Discriminant of a quadratic field).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1given

Insert d=−1 and d=−3 in the given integral-basis formula.

2.1step 1.1given∎

Insert the same residues modulo 4 in the given discriminant formula.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

The integral basis and discriminant of Q(sqrt 5)

Example

Put K=Q(5) and ω=(1+5)/2. Then OK=Z[ω], (1,ω) is an integral basis, and disc⁡(K)=5. The suborder Z[5] has basis (1,5), index 2, and discriminant 20.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: K=Q(5) and ω=(1+5)/2.

[F1]

For squarefree d≠1, the quadratic integral-basis formula applies (Integers in a quadratic field).

[F2]

The corresponding quadratic-field discriminant is d when d≡1(mod4) (Discriminant of a quadratic field).

[F3]

An order A⊆OK satisfies disc⁡(A)=[OK:A]2disc⁡(K) (Order-index discriminant formula).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1F2given

Since 5≡1(mod4), [F1] gives OK=Z[ω]; [F2] gives disc⁡(K)=5.

2.1F3step 1.1algebra∎

In the basis (1,ω), one has 5=2ω−1, so the change matrix to (1,5) has determinant 2. Thus [OK:Z[5]]=2, and [F3] gives disc⁡(Z[5])=22⋅5=20.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

A pure cubic power basis: why the squarefree-discriminant certificate does not apply

Example

Let α=23 and K=Q(α). The power basis (1,α,α2) has discriminant −108. Consequently the squarefree power-basis criterion does not certify that Z[α] is the full ring of integers. This example records the boundary of that criterion; it makes no claim here about the actual index of Z[α].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: α=23 and its polynomial f(X)=X3−2.

[F1]

The discriminant of a power basis is the polynomial discriminant of the minimal polynomial (Power-basis and polynomial discriminants).

[F2]

The squarefree criterion concludes maximality only when the power-basis discriminant is squarefree (Squarefree power discriminant criterion).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1given

Eisenstein's criterion at 2 makes f irreducible over Q; thus it is the monic minimal polynomial of the integral element α and (1,α,α2) is a Q-basis of K.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

The cubic discriminant formula gives disc⁡(f)=−27(−2)2=−108. By [F1] this is the discriminant of the displayed power basis.

3.1F2step 2.1∎

Since −108 is divisible by 22 and 33, it is not squarefree. Therefore the hypothesis of [F2] fails, so that criterion supplies no maximality conclusion in this example.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

The nonmaximal quadratic order Z[sqrt 5] inside O_Q(sqrt 5)

Example

For K=Q(5), the subring A=Z[5] is an order in OK=Z[(1+5)/2]. It has index 2 and disc⁡(A)=20=22⋅5.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: K=Q(5) and A=Z[5].

[F1]

An order is a unital full-rank subring of OK (Order in a number field).

[F2]

The integral basis (1,ω) with ω=(1+5)/2 has field discriminant 5 (The integral basis and discriminant of Q(sqrt 5)).

[F3]

The order-index discriminant formula applies to A⊆OK (Order-index discriminant formula).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1F2given

Since 5=2ω−1, A is the subring generated by an integral element and has full-rank basis (1,5); hence [F1] makes it an order.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra∎

Relative to (1,ω), the basis (1,5) has determinant 2. Thus [OK:A]=2, and [F3] with [F2] gives disc⁡(A)=22⋅5=20.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Index 2 obstructs reading factorisation from Z[sqrt 5] modulo 2

Example

For A=Z[5]⊊OK with K=Q(5), reduction of the power polynomial X2−5 modulo 2 gives (X+1)2. But OK/2OK≅F2[X]/(X2+X+1), which is a field. Thus the repeated factor in the nonmaximal power order is not a factorisation assertion about OK.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: K=Q(5), A=Z[5], and ω=(1+5)/2.

[F1]

The order A has index 2 in OK (The nonmaximal quadratic order Z[sqrt 5] inside O_Q(sqrt 5)).

[F2]

The index-discriminant formula detects this nonmaximality (Order-index discriminant formula).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1givenalgebra

In A/2A, the class of 5 satisfies X2−5≡X2+1=(X+1)2, so A/2A≅F2[X]/((X+1)2) has a nonzero nilpotent.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

The element ω satisfies ω2−ω−1=0. Hence OK/2OK≅F2[X]/(X2+X+1); the polynomial has no root in F2, so this quotient is a field.

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1∎

The two quotient rings cannot agree, and [F2] identifies the reason as the index divisible by 2. Therefore reduction of the power polynomial in A cannot by itself describe factorisation in the maximal order.

RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

Nonmonogenic example source obligation

The planned concrete nonmonogenic-field slot is deliberately not asserted. The opened sources contain only a general warning here; a named field needs a separate complete source and proof before it can be authored.

Sources