How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Number Fields Rings of Integers and Discriminants — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Dedekind Domains and Ideal Classes
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Integral Extensions and Going Up
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Modules over a Principal Ideal Domain and the Canonical Forms
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Number Fields Rings of Integers and Discriminants
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Solvability by Radicals and Kummer Theory
- Splitting Fields
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Galois Correspondence
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
The examples calculate integral bases and discriminants while keeping the index of a power order explicit. The pure-cubic entry records that a squarefree-discriminant maximality certificate is unavailable there; no nonmonogenic field is asserted without a complete source.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Integers of Q
Example
and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A rational number in lowest terms.
Verification
Its monic minimal polynomial is , integral only when .
The basis has trace Gram determinant .
Gaussian and Eisenstein integral bases
Example
, ; and , .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The quadratic integer and discriminant formulas (Integers in a quadratic field, Discriminant of a quadratic field).
Verification
Insert and in the given integral-basis formula.
Insert the same residues modulo in the given discriminant formula.
The integral basis and discriminant of Q(sqrt 5)
Example
Put and . Then , is an integral basis, and . The suborder has basis , index , and discriminant .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and .
For squarefree , the quadratic integral-basis formula applies (Integers in a quadratic field).
The corresponding quadratic-field discriminant is when (Discriminant of a quadratic field).
An order satisfies (Order-index discriminant formula).
Verification
Since , [F1] gives ; [F2] gives .
In the basis , one has , so the change matrix to has determinant . Thus , and [F3] gives .
A pure cubic power basis: why the squarefree-discriminant certificate does not apply
Example
Let and . The power basis has discriminant . Consequently the squarefree power-basis criterion does not certify that is the full ring of integers. This example records the boundary of that criterion; it makes no claim here about the actual index of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and its polynomial .
The discriminant of a power basis is the polynomial discriminant of the minimal polynomial (Power-basis and polynomial discriminants).
The squarefree criterion concludes maximality only when the power-basis discriminant is squarefree (Squarefree power discriminant criterion).
Verification
Eisenstein's criterion at makes irreducible over ; thus it is the monic minimal polynomial of the integral element and is a -basis of .
The cubic discriminant formula gives . By [F1] this is the discriminant of the displayed power basis.
Since is divisible by and , it is not squarefree. Therefore the hypothesis of [F2] fails, so that criterion supplies no maximality conclusion in this example.
The nonmaximal quadratic order Z[sqrt 5] inside O_Q(sqrt 5)
Example
For , the subring is an order in . It has index and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and .
An order is a unital full-rank subring of (Order in a number field).
The integral basis with has field discriminant (The integral basis and discriminant of Q(sqrt 5)).
The order-index discriminant formula applies to (Order-index discriminant formula).
Verification
Since , is the subring generated by an integral element and has full-rank basis ; hence [F1] makes it an order.
Relative to , the basis has determinant . Thus , and [F3] with [F2] gives .
Index 2 obstructs reading factorisation from Z[sqrt 5] modulo 2
Example
For with , reduction of the power polynomial modulo gives . But , which is a field. Thus the repeated factor in the nonmaximal power order is not a factorisation assertion about .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and .
The order has index in (The nonmaximal quadratic order Z[sqrt 5] inside O_Q(sqrt 5)).
The index-discriminant formula detects this nonmaximality (Order-index discriminant formula).
Verification
In , the class of satisfies , so has a nonzero nilpotent.
The element satisfies . Hence ; the polynomial has no root in , so this quotient is a field.
The two quotient rings cannot agree, and [F2] identifies the reason as the index divisible by . Therefore reduction of the power polynomial in cannot by itself describe factorisation in the maximal order.
Nonmonogenic example source obligation
The planned concrete nonmonogenic-field slot is deliberately not asserted. The opened sources contain only a general warning here; a named field needs a separate complete source and proof before it can be authored.