How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Index 2 obstructs reading factorisation from Z[sqrt 5] modulo 2
Example
For with , reduction of the power polynomial modulo gives . But , which is a field. Thus the repeated factor in the nonmaximal power order is not a factorisation assertion about .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and .
The order has index in (The nonmaximal quadratic order Z[sqrt 5] inside O_Q(sqrt 5)).
The index-discriminant formula detects this nonmaximality (Order-index discriminant formula).
Verification
In , the class of satisfies , so has a nonzero nilpotent.
The element satisfies . Hence ; the polynomial has no root in , so this quotient is a field.
The two quotient rings cannot agree, and [F2] identifies the reason as the index divisible by . Therefore reduction of the power polynomial in cannot by itself describe factorisation in the maximal order.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- William Stein, Algebraic Number Theory, Section 6.1 (standard reference, not scraped)