Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Separable reflexive space has separable dual

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω and the relative Hahn–Banach principle HB. If a real or complex Banach space X is reflexive and norm separable, then its continuous dual X∗ is norm separable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, HB, and a real or complex separable reflexive Banach space X.

[F1]

A space is separable precisely when it has an at most countable dense subset (Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset).

[F2]

Reflexivity says that the canonical map JX:X→X∗∗ is surjective (Reflexivity is surjectivity of the canonical map); under the assumed relative HB principle it is also an isometric embedding (Relative Hahn–Banach makes the canonical bidual map an isometry).

[F3]

Under ACω and HB, a real or complex normed space whose continuous dual is norm separable is itself norm separable (Separable dual implies separable primal).

Proof

technique · transport a dense set through the canonical isometry and apply the preceding theorem to the dual space
1.1givenF1F2

By [F1], fix an at most countable norm-dense set D⊆X. Its image JX[D] is at most countable: the restriction of the injective map JX is a bijection from D onto that image.

2.1step 1.1F1F2

The image JX[D] is norm dense in X∗∗. Indeed, for Φ∈X∗∗ and ε>0, surjectivity in [F2] gives x∈X with Φ=JXx, and density of D gives d∈D with ∥x−d∥<ε; the isometry in [F2] then gives ∥Φ−JXd∥=∥JX(x−d)∥=∥x−d∥<ε. Thus X∗∗ is norm separable by [F1].

3.1givenstep 2.1F3∎

Apply [F3] to the normed space Y=X∗. Its continuous dual is Y∗=X∗∗, which is separable by step 2.1, so X∗ is norm separable. No new selection or separation is made here: ACω and HB are used exactly through [F3].

Source notes

Brezis proves the same implication by identifying X with X∗∗ and applying the separable-dual theorem to X∗. Reflexivity is essential: Brezis's Remark 19 records L1 as separable with nonseparable dual L∞; that warning is source context and is not used as a supplier in the proof above.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources