How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The biproduct of morphisms is the diagonal matrix
Statement
For morphisms and , the induced morphism
has matrix
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Morphisms and in an additive category.
Morphisms between finite biproducts are determined by their matrix entries (Morphisms between finite biproducts correspond to matrices).
Composition of those morphisms is ordinary matrix multiplication (Composition of morphisms between finite biproducts is matrix multiplication).
Proof
By definition, is the unique morphism whose composites with the two injections and two projections act as and on the matching summands and as zero on the off-diagonal summands.
Therefore its four matrix entries are , , , and in the expected positions. The multiplication rule of [L2] is exactly what makes this diagonal description functorial under further direct sums and composition.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Saunders Mac Lane, Categories for the Working Mathematician, VIII.2 (standard reference, not scraped)