How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Composition of morphisms between finite biproducts is matrix multiplication
Statement
Let be an additive category. Let have matrix and let have matrix . Then the matrix of is
The finiteness of the middle index set is part of the statement.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Morphisms and between finite biproducts in an additive category, with matrix entries and .
A morphism between finite biproducts is reconstructed from its matrix by a finite sum of injection-entry-projection terms (Morphisms between finite biproducts correspond to matrices).
Proof
By [L1], one may write and , where are the projections of the middle biproduct and are the injections of the target biproduct.
Multiply the two finite sums and use the zero equations for and . The only surviving terms are , so .
Taking the entry of the matrix, again by [L1], yields . The sum is finite because the middle biproduct has only summands.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Merlin Christ, Tobias Dyckerhoff, and Tashi Walde, Lax Additivity, formula (2.6) (standard reference, not scraped)