How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The hereditary class of all finite graphs does not have the Erdős–Hajnal property
Statement
The hereditary class of all finite graphs does not have the Erdős–Hajnal property.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The class of all finite graphs.
A hereditary class has the Erdős–Hajnal property exactly when some satisfies for every nonempty graph in the class (The Erdős–Hajnal property and an Erdős–Hajnal constant for a hereditary graph class).
For every , some -vertex graph satisfies (For every there is an -vertex graph with ).
For every , as (The logarithm grows more slowly than every positive real power).
Proof
Suppose, for contradiction, that has an Erdős–Hajnal constant .
By [L3] and [L4], choose an integer so large that .
Choose from [L2] an -vertex graph with , contradicting [L1] and step 1.1. Therefore does not have the Erdős–Hajnal property.
Depends on
Used by
- Every hereditary graph class has the Erdős–Hajnal property False statement
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 70 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Chernikov, MATH 223M notes, sec. 3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)