How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every graph has the Erdős–Hajnal property if and only if every prime graph does
Statement
The following are equivalent.
- Every finite simple graph has the Erdős–Hajnal property (The Erdős–Hajnal property and an Erdős–Hajnal constant for a hereditary graph class).
- Every prime graph (Prime graphs: those whose only modules are the trivial ones) has the Erdős–Hajnal property.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two assertions above.
A graph on at least two vertices is prime exactly when it is not obtained by substituting one graph on at least two vertices for a vertex of another such graph (A graph with at least two vertices is prime exactly when it is not obtained by substituting one graph on at least two vertices for a vertex of another graph on at least two vertices).
If and have the Erdős–Hajnal property, then the graph obtained by substituting for a vertex of has the Erdős–Hajnal property (Alon–Pach–Solymosi: if and have the Erdős–Hajnal property, so does the graph obtained from by substituting for a vertex).
A graph on or vertices is prime, since every module is trivial (Prime graphs: those whose only modules are the trivial ones, The cardinality of a finite set).
Proof
If every graph has the Erdős–Hajnal property, then in particular every prime graph has it.
For the converse direction, assume every prime graph has the Erdős–Hajnal property, and induct on the number of vertices of a graph .
If , then is prime by [L3], so the assumption covers .
Fix and assume inductively that every graph with fewer than vertices has the Erdős–Hajnal property whenever every prime graph does. Let have vertices. If is prime, the assumption on prime graphs covers it. Otherwise [L1] gives graphs with at least two vertices each such that for some vertex of .
In the non-prime case of step 1.4, both and have fewer than vertices, so the induction hypothesis gives the Erdős–Hajnal property for both, and then [L2] gives it for .
Steps 1.3, 1.4 and 2.1 prove that every -vertex graph has the Erdős–Hajnal property, so the induction closes.
Depends on
- Alon–Pach–Solymosi: if $H_1$ and $H_2$ have the Erdős–Hajnal property, so does the graph obtained from $H_1$ by substituting $H_2$ for a vertex
- A graph with at least two vertices is prime exactly when it is not obtained by substituting one graph on at least two vertices for a vertex of another graph on at least two vertices
- Prime graphs: those whose only modules are the trivial ones
- The Erdős–Hajnal property and an Erdős–Hajnal constant for a hereditary graph class
- Substituting one graph for a vertex of another
- The cardinality $\lvert A\rvert$ of a finite set
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Y. Huang, Q. Ju, and X. Zhou, Erdős-Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, sec. 1.2 (standard reference, not scraped)