How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The trace of counts closed walks of length
Statement
Let be a finite simple graph with adjacency matrix , and let . Then
equals the number of closed walks of length in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite simple graph with adjacency matrix , and an integer .
The entry counts the walks of length from back to (The entry of counts walks of length ).
The trace of a square matrix is the sum of its diagonal entries (The trace of a square matrix over a commutative ring).
Proof
For each vertex , a walk of length from to itself is exactly a closed walk of length whose chosen start vertex is , so [L1] makes the number of such closed walks.
Summing step 1.1 over all vertices counts every closed walk of length exactly once for each of its chosen start vertices, and by [F1] that sum is . Hence the trace counts the closed walks of length .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard P. Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics, Volume 1, Corollary 4.7.3 (standard reference, not scraped)