How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The accessible manifold of a leaf
Definition
Assume . Let be a smooth cooriented codimension-one foliation of a boundaryless manifold , and let be a leaf. Its strict positive accessible set consists of the endpoints of genuine nonempty smooth positively transverse paths whose starting points lie in . Equality of leaves is not an empty-path convention in this definition: belongs to only if a genuine positive return exists.
The set is open and saturated. A leaf meets a closed transversal exactly when . On a compact , tautness is equivalent to being the connected component of containing , for every leaf . Thus the equality requires connected . These properties, including the finite box constructions that justify them, are proved in A no-transversal leaf bounds a positive accessibility region with finite inward boundary ↗. The set is an open submanifold by openness; the word manifold introduces no separate structure or axiom.
Remarks
The cited lemma states its conclusions for closed . Its openness, saturation and return constructions extend to the boundaryless case used here: their compact sets are the images of finitely many paths, not the whole ambient manifold. Openness follows by varying the last positive chart segment. To move an endpoint along a compact leafwise path , use a positive local field and its flow . For a positive defining form , compactness gives and . An offset with , , makes the displaced path strictly positive; use positive initial and negative terminal offsets vanishing at the desired outer endpoints, and interpolate along the original positive segment. Small offsets and chartwise smoothing preserve positivity. Thus endpoints may be moved within their leaves and returns may be closed.
For the closed immersed return, the finite source-chart perturbation in steps 2.1–3.1 of the cited proof uses only a compact curve neighbourhood: in dimension at least three it removes coincidences; in dimension two it gives finitely many double crossings, resolved by pairing the increasing transverse branches in order. Keep one chosen crossing of fixed and retain the resulting embedded circle through it. In dimension one, a return is a periodic orbit of a positive field; uniqueness gives the embedded once-around circle in its orbit component, so ambient compactness is unnecessary. Conversely an embedded positive circle supplies a genuine return. The tautness criterion asserted above is restricted to compact and is exactly the cited lemma's componentwise conclusion.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Steven Hurder and Remi Langevin, Dynamics and the Godbillon-Vey Class of C1 Foliations (complete author-hosted PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)
- S. P. Novikov, The Topology of Foliations (English translation by J. A. Zilber; complete PDF of the translation) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Samuel Ranz, Approximately Holomorphic Techniques in Foliations: A Simple Proof of Novikov's Theorem (PhD thesis, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, 2024; complete PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)