How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The countable-choice principle used in the foliation pair
Definition
The countable choice principle used throughout this pair, written , is the assertion:
For every sequence of nonempty sets there is a function with domain such that for every .
Here "sequence" means a function on (A function is a relation with and implying ; , the value , domain and codomain). We call the displayed selector an indexed choice function for the sequence. Its domain is the index set , whereas a choice function in Choice function has as domain the family of sets themselves. These notions must be distinguished when factors repeat. A family choice function on gives an indexed selector by ; the equivalence of the two existence assertions is explained in The Axiom of Countable Choice ().
This is the sequence formulation of countable choice. The equivalent nonempty-product formulation, that is nonempty for every sequence of nonempty sets, is verified in Countable choice is equivalent to nonempty countable products ↗; that lemma is recorded as the well-definedness certificate of the present definition.
In this pair is a stated hypothesis of the foliation theorems and of the items whose proof selects countably many plaque data. It is not assumed where a proof does not use it, and the items that consume it state the hypothesis explicitly.
This pair-local carrier is retained deliberately: it restates the published The Axiom of Countable Choice () in exactly the sequence form consumed by the foliation items, and the published definition supplies the same principle. The retention and its cross-batch consequences are recorded in the Step-3 report of this pair (finding F4).
Depends on
Used by
- Closed defining forms have vanishing Godbillon-Vey class Corollary
- Finiteness of the fundamental group is sufficient, but not necessary, for Reeb stability Corollary
- Reebless leaves are pi-one-injective and transverse loops are essential Corollary
- Trivial holonomy gives a product foliated neighbourhood Corollary
- A compact leaf with infinite fundamental group can still have trivial holonomy Counterexample
- A noncompact foliation violating Novikov's compactness conclusions Counterexample
- A Reeb component has a compact boundary leaf with infinite holonomy Counterexample
- Limit cycles of a leaf Definition
- Limitwise-nullhomotopy predicate on based loops Definition
- Limitwise-nullhomotopy subgroup of a leaf Definition
- Reeb components of a codimension-one foliation Definition
- Smooth foliated concordance of codimension-one foliations Definition
- Smooth foliations tangent to the boundary Definition
- Taut codimension-one foliations Definition
- The accessible manifold of a leaf Definition
- The Bott partial connection on the normal bundle of a foliation Definition
- The finite-holonomy normal model of a compact leaf Definition
- The Godbillon-Vey class of a codimension-one foliation Definition
- Transversely oriented codimension-one foliations Definition
- Vanishing cycles of a codimension-one foliation Definition
- A fibration over the circle as a globally stable foliation Example
- A fibration over the circle has zero Godbillon-Vey class Example
- A fibre foliation of a mapping torus is taut Example
- Explicit Godbillon-Vey rescaling calculation Example
- The finite-holonomy normal model of the Möbius band Example
- The product foliation near a compact leaf with trivial holonomy Example
- The Reeb foliation of the three-sphere is not taut Example
- A C² first-integral period annulus has a C² leaf product Lemma
- A C² leaf meets a local box transversal in at most countably many points Lemma
- A center period annulus has an orbit or polycycle frontier Lemma
- A characteristic disk with essential boundary data produces a vanishing cycle Lemma
- A closed null fence word has an essential lower endpoint Lemma
- A co-oriented closed transversal detects nonvanishing rational homology of a compact leaf Lemma
- A compact holonomy-free codimension-one foliation is fibered over its leaf space Lemma
- A compact leafwise nullhomotopy persists under a transverse deformation Lemma
- A compressible leaf yields a vanishing cycle Lemma
- A finite characteristic circuit has C² regular port traces Lemma
- A finite saddle omega-graph is strongly connected and is a finite union of polycycles Lemma
- A first saddle lobe admits a collar-fixed center-saddle cancellation Lemma
- A fixed cap product glues by unique transverse flow roots Lemma
…and 79 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- D. H. Fremlin, Measure Theory, Chapter 56 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Axiom of countable choice (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)