Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The countable-choice principle used in the foliation pair

Definition

The countable choice principle used throughout this pair, written ACω, is the assertion:

For every sequence (An)n∈N of nonempty sets there is a function c with domain N such that c(n)∈An for every n∈N.

Here "sequence" means a function on N (A function is a relation f with (a,b)∈f and (a,c)∈f implying b=c; f:A→B, the value f(a), domain and codomain). We call the displayed selector c an indexed choice function for the sequence. Its domain is the index set N, whereas a choice function in Choice function has as domain the family of sets themselves. These notions must be distinguished when factors repeat. A family choice function g on {An:n∈N} gives an indexed selector by c(n)=g(An); the equivalence of the two existence assertions is explained in The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω).

This is the sequence formulation of countable choice. The equivalent nonempty-product formulation, that ∏n∈NAn is nonempty for every sequence (An)n∈N of nonempty sets, is verified in Countable choice is equivalent to nonempty countable products ↗; that lemma is recorded as the well-definedness certificate of the present definition.

In this pair ACω is a stated hypothesis of the foliation theorems and of the items whose proof selects countably many plaque data. It is not assumed where a proof does not use it, and the items that consume it state the hypothesis explicitly.

This pair-local carrier is retained deliberately: it restates the published The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) in exactly the sequence form consumed by the foliation items, and the published definition supplies the same principle. The retention and its cross-batch consequences are recorded in the Step-3 report of this pair (finding F4).

Depends on

Used by

…and 79 more results.

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources