How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Explicit Godbillon-Vey rescaling calculation
Example
Assume Countable Choice . On with coordinates let , so that is a nowhere-vanishing defining form and is the regular codimension-one foliation by the surfaces , . The -form satisfies , and with , nonzero where . For the rescaled defining form , the form satisfies , , and ; the difference is the exact form , the explicit instance of Rescaling the defining form changes the Godbillon-Vey form by an exact form with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: with coordinates , the function , the one-form , and the one-form .
The kernel of the differential of a constant-rank submersion is an integrable distribution whose leaves are the connected components of the level sets. (The kernel distribution of a constant-rank submersion is integrable).
If and , then satisfies and , so the two forms define the same de Rham class. (Rescaling the defining form changes the Godbillon-Vey form by an exact form).
Proof
The function has nowhere zero, so is a constant-rank submersion and by [F1] the common kernel is an integrable codimension-one distribution whose leaves are the level surfaces , .
A direct calculation gives and . Also and , which is nonzero exactly where . The level surfaces in step 1.1 are connected graphs over the plane, so the supplier’s connected components are precisely these surfaces.
For one has , so is admissible with and ; the last term is exact by the graded Leibniz rule, so and define the same Godbillon-Vey class, which is the explicit instance of [F2] with , the discrepancy being exactly the rescaled form modulo an exact form.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Steven Hurder and Remi Langevin, Dynamics and the Godbillon-Vey Class of C1 Foliations (complete author-hosted PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)