How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Regular foliations and integrable distributions correspond
Statement
On an -manifold , regular foliations of leaf dimension and integrable rank- distributions determine each other:
- a regular foliation atlas defines an integrable tangent distribution;
- an integrable rank- distribution defines a regular foliation atlas whose leaves are its maximal connected integral manifolds.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Either a regular foliation atlas of leaf dimension or an integrable rank- distribution on .
In foliation charts and flat charts, plaques are the local leaf pieces.
Proof
In a regular foliation chart , declare the tangent distribution to [given] be the span of . Because overlap maps send plaque directions to plaque directions, these local -planes patch to a smooth rank- distribution. Plaques are local integral manifolds, so the distribution is integrable.
Conversely, let be an integrable rank- distribution. By the [given] local Frobenius theorem, every point has a flat chart for . Choose a covering by sufficiently small restrictions of these charts, refining overlap domains into plaque-coordinate neighborhoods. On each such overlap the new transverse coordinate has differential zero in every old plaque direction, so it is locally a function only of the old transverse coordinate. The refined charts therefore have transitions of the form required by a regular foliation atlas. This asserts existence of a compatible refined atlas; it does not claim that every unrestricted flat chart belongs to one common atlas.
In that atlas the plaques are precisely the local integral pieces of [given] , so the global leaves are exactly the maximal connected integral manifolds. The two constructions therefore recover one another.
Thus regular foliations and integrable distributions correspond. [given] ∎
Depends on
Used by
- Orbit circles of rotation as a foliation away from the origin Example
- The irrational linear foliation of the two-torus Example
- The level-set foliation of a regular function Example
- The Mobius-band line foliation Example
- The product foliation Example
- Every leaf of a regular foliation is an embedded submanifold False statement
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)
- Will J. Merry, Differential Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)