Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-05
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every connected tangent map meeting a leaf factors uniquely through that leaf

Statement

Let D be an integrable distribution on M, let L be one of its maximal leaves, and let F:PM be a smooth map from a connected manifold P such that dF(TP)D and F(P) meets L. Then:

  1. F(P)L, and
  2. there is a unique smooth map F~:PL with jF~=F, where j:LM is the inclusion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A connected manifold P, a smooth map F:PM tangent to an integrable distribution D, and a maximal leaf L meeting F(P).

[A1]

Let U:=F1(L).

[L1]

An integrable distribution has a flat coordinate chart around every point (Frobenius local coordinate theorem).

[L2]

A smooth real-valued function with zero differential is constant on each connected component (A smooth function with zero differential is constant on each connected component).

[L3]

A maximal leaf has the unique smooth structure constructed from its local plaque charts, and its inclusion in M is an injective integral immersion (Existence and uniqueness of maximal connected integral manifolds).

[L4]
[L5]

The connected components of a flat-coordinate slice are its plaques (Plaques of a flat chart).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The set U is nonempty by hypothesis. If xU, use [L1] to choose a flat chart φ=(u,v):WRk×Rnk around F(x), and choose a connected coordinate neighborhood C of x contained in the open set F1(W). On C, each component of vF has zero differential because dF(TP)D=kerdv, so [L2] makes vF constant. Thus [L5] puts F(C) in the plaque through F(x), which lies in L. Hence CU, and U is open.

A1L1L2L5given
2.1

If xPU, the same [L1]–[L2] argument gives a connected open neighborhood C of x whose image lies in one plaque and hence one leaf. That leaf is not L, because it contains F(x)L, so CPU. Thus PU is open. Now U is a nonempty clopen subset of the connected space P, so [L4] gives U=P and therefore F(P)L.

A1L1L2L4L5step 1.1
3.1

The inclusion j is injective by [L3], so step 2.1 forces a unique set map F~:PL with jF~=F. Around each xP, repeat the flat-chart argument of step 1.1 to obtain a connected neighborhood whose image lies in one plaque. That plaque is a smooth coordinate patch of L by [L3], and in its plaque coordinates F~ has the same smooth coordinate expression as F. Hence F~ is smooth, and injectivity of j gives uniqueness.

L1L2L3L5step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

Therefore every connected tangent map that meets a leaf factors uniquely through that leaf.

step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources