How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Existence and uniqueness of maximal connected integral manifolds
Statement
Let be an integrable rank- distribution on a manifold , and let be the -equivalence class of a point . Then:
- carries a unique smooth structure for which the inclusion is a connected injective immersion and an integral manifold of .
- If is any connected integral manifold of with for some , then there is a unique smooth map such that .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integrable rank- distribution and a point .
Let be the reachability class of under tangent piecewise smooth curves.
An integrable distribution has a flat coordinate chart around every point (Frobenius local coordinate theorem).
Plaques from two flat charts through the same point have compatible germs (Overlapping plaques through a point have compatible germs).
Each connected component of the inverse image of a flat-chart domain under an integral immersion maps into one plaque (Integral manifolds are locally contained in plaques).
A map between equal-dimensional Euclidean open sets with invertible derivative is a local diffeomorphism (The Euclidean inverse function theorem).
The standing assumption for smooth distributions is available (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
A manifold is Hausdorff and second countable (Topological manifolds without boundary: Hausdorff, second-countable, and locally Euclidean spaces).
Under , every second-countable space is Lindelof (Assuming countable choice, every second countable space is Lindelöf).
The connected components of a topological manifold are open and form an at most countable family (Components of a topological manifold are open and at most countable).
Under , a countable union of at most countable sets is at most countable (Countable unions of at most countable sets, assuming ).
A connected locally path-connected space is path connected (A connected, locally path-connected space is path-connected, because its path components are open); in particular, each plaque is path connected in its Euclidean slice coordinates (Plaques of a flat chart).
A smooth real-valued function with zero differential is constant on each connected component (A smooth function with zero differential is constant on each connected component).
Proof
By [L1], restrictions of flat charts to coordinate boxes form an open cover of . By [L5], [L6], and [A2], choose a countable such cover . A plaque through a point of lies in : [L9] joins its points within the plaque, and its tangent spaces are . Hence the plaques of the chosen cover that meet cover .
Let be a connected integral manifold with , and put . For , choose a flat-chart domain about and let be the connected component of containing . By [L7], is an open neighborhood of , and [L3] maps it into one plaque. If , that plaque lies in ; if , it lies in a different reachability class. Thus and its complement are open. Since is connected and , one has , so .
Fix one chosen-cover plaque through . If a chosen-cover plaque lies in , then for each the components of , viewed in the intrinsic Euclidean-slice topology of , form an at most countable family by [L7]. Applying [L3] to the plaque inclusion shows that each such component lies in one plaque of , so meets at most countably many chosen-cover plaques. By [L8], the same is true across all . Starting from , take all neighbors at each finite stage and then the union over the countably many finite stages; [L8] makes the resulting family at most countable. Every member lies in by [L9]. Conversely, on each smooth segment of a tangent path the transverse flat-chart coordinates have zero derivative and are constant by [L10], so the path is locally contained in a chosen-cover plaque. Compactness of its parameter interval gives a finite plaque subdivision from to a plaque containing its endpoint. Hence covers .
Give each its Euclidean slice coordinates. By [L2], overlapping plaque coordinates have smooth transition maps, so these patches form a smooth atlas. It is countable by step 2.1, and each Euclidean patch has a countable basis, so [L8] makes the induced topology second countable. The inclusion is continuous and injective in these patches; since is Hausdorff by [L5], distinct points of have disjoint inverse-image neighborhoods, so the induced topology is Hausdorff. It is locally Euclidean by construction. Therefore it is a smooth -manifold, and in plaque coordinates is an injective immersion with tangent image .
The class is path connected in this topology: a tangent path from to any of its points admits the finite plaque subdivision used in step 2.1, and is continuous in each plaque chart. Hence is a connected integral manifold.
The equation now forces a unique set map . For any flat-chart domain , [L3] maps each connected component of into one plaque, and in that plaque chart has the same coordinate expression as . Hence is smooth, and uniqueness follows from injectivity of .
It remains to prove uniqueness of the smooth structure. If , every plaque and hence the connected leaf is the singleton , which has only its unique zero-manifold structure. Assume and let another smooth structure on make a connected integral injective immersion. By [L3], every point has a connected neighborhood in that alternative structure whose image lies in one plaque of step 3.1. The coordinate expression of from that neighborhood to the plaque is between -manifolds and has invertible derivative because both tangent images equal ; [L4] makes it a local diffeomorphism. Thus the alternative charts and the plaque charts are smoothly compatible in both directions, so the structures coincide.
Steps 3.1 and 4.1 give the asserted connected integral leaf structure, steps 1.2 and 4.2 give the universal factorization, and step 4.3 proves uniqueness; consequently is the unique maximal connected integral manifold through .
Depends on
- The leaf equivalence relation of an integrable distribution
- Tangent-curve reachability is an equivalence relation
- Frobenius local coordinate theorem
- Flat charts for a distribution
- Plaques of a flat chart
- Integral manifolds are locally contained in plaques
- Overlapping plaques through a point have compatible germs
- Integral manifolds of a distribution
- The Euclidean inverse function theorem
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Topological manifolds without boundary: Hausdorff, second-countable, and locally Euclidean spaces
- Assuming countable choice, every second countable space is Lindelöf
- Components of a topological manifold are open and at most countable
- Countable unions of at most countable sets, assuming $\mathrm{AC}_\omega$
- A connected, locally path-connected space is path-connected, because its path components are open
- A smooth function with zero differential is constant on each connected component
Used by
- Maximal integral manifolds partition the manifold Corollary
- Leaves of a Lie subalgebra distribution Example
- Every leaf of a regular foliation is an embedded submanifold False statement
- Embedded leaves need not be closed and leaves need not be embedded Proposition
- Every connected tangent map meeting a leaf factors uniquely through that leaf Proposition
- Regular foliations and integrable distributions correspond Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
63 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Will J. Merry, Differential Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)
- Keith Conrad, Local and global Frobenius theorems (standard reference, not scraped)