Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A C² leaf meets a local box transversal in at most countably many points

Statement

Assume ACω. Let F be a C2 foliation on a second-countable smooth manifold, let L be a leaf, and let τ:J→Q be a vertical transverse interval in one foliation box. Then τ−1(L) is at most countable. If a countable foliation- box atlas is supplied as part of the data, the countability conclusion uses no choice principle. Dense and nonembedded leaves are allowed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω. A C2 foliation F on a second-countable smooth manifold M, a leaf L, and a vertical transverse interval τ:J→Q in one foliation box Q.

[F1]

A second-countable space is Lindelof: every open cover has a countable subcover. (Assuming countable choice, every second countable space is Lindelöf).

[F2]

The connected components of an open subset of Rn are open and polygonally connected. (Every connected component of an open subset of Rn is open and polygonally connected).

[F3]

For nonnegative integers the pairing p(a,b)=(a+b)(a+b+1)/2+b is injective: pairs with a+b=d occupy the disjoint consecutive interval from d(d+1)/2 to (d+1)(d+2)/2−1, and the offset recovers b and hence a. Starting with b0=0, put bj=p(bj−1,aj) and encode a word (a1,…,ak) by p(k,bk). Decoding the outer pair recovers k, and recursively decoding the inner pairs recovers the word. Thus finite natural-number words admit this explicit injection into N, without using later computability theory.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1given

Fix the second-countable C2 foliated manifold, the leaf L, the foliation box Q and the vertical transverse interval τ, and if the leaf dimension is zero, every plaque and hence every leaf is a singleton, so the intersection has at most one point and the conclusion is immediate. Otherwise fix one plaque P0 of L inside the recorded atlas; a vertical interval meets each plaque of Q in at most one point, because the transverse coordinate is constant on a plaque while τ varies only in the transverse direction.

1.2F1given

By [F1] the second-countable manifold has a countable cover by foliation boxes; selecting one foliation chart for each member of that countable subcover uses the stated countable choice, and adjoin the specified box Q and the box of the initial plaque P0 to that countable atlas (a finite addition), and record this enlarged countable atlas as fixed data for the rest of the argument.

2.1givenstep 1.1

Say a plaque is reached when it can be joined to P0 by a finite chain of plaques of the recorded atlas in which consecutive plaques intersect; every plaque of L is reached by definition of the plaque-chain relation, and it suffices to count the reached plaques contained in Q.

2.2F2step 1.2

Let P be a reached plaque in a box U and let V be a next box of the recorded atlas; in plaque coordinates the trace of P inside V is an open subset of the plaque coordinate space Rdim⁡L, whose connected components are open and polygonally connected by [F2]; each nonempty component lies in a single plaque of V, because the plaques of V partition the open set L∩V into pairwise disjoint open subsets of the leaf, so a connected subset of L∩V cannot meet two of them; code each nonempty component by the least rational-box basis index contained in it, so distinct components, being disjoint, receive distinct codes, and given the current plaque P and the next box V the component code therefore determines at most one successor plaque.

3.1F3step 2.2

Encode each finite chain of successor data by the natural-number coding of finite sequences from [F3], and assign to each reached plaque in Q the least code of a finite chain reaching it; this is a well-defined injection of the reached plaques of Q into N and does not select a chain at each plaque.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1∎

The reached plaques of L inside Q are therefore at most countable, and by step 1.1 each of them meets τ in at most one point, so τ−1(L) injects into a countable set and is at most countable; a countable box atlas already supplied as data removes the only countable choice of step 1.2, and dense or nonembedded leaves are allowed since only plaque chains were used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources