Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A finitely cornered regular plane curve separates without choice

Statement

Let c:S1→R2 be a piecewise-C1 topological embedding with finitely many corner parameters. Assume each smooth edge is regular up to its endpoints and the two incident one-sided tangent rays at each corner are distinct. Then R2∖c(S1) has exactly two connected components, one bounded and one unbounded, and each has boundary c(S1). No choice axiom is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A piecewise-C1 topological embedding c:S1→R2 with finitely many corner parameters, each smooth edge regular up to its endpoints and the two incident one-sided tangent rays distinct at each corner.

[F1]

If an oriented closed piecewise-C1 contour contains exactly one regular C1 arc near 0, traversed once with positive real tangent, and the remaining contour is compact and disjoint from 0, then for all small ε>0 the points iε and −iε avoid it and the two winding numbers differ by 1. (The winding number jumps by one across a regular planar arc).

[F2]

If the trace stays at distance at least d from p0 and ∣p−p0∣<d/2, then ∣n(Γ,p)−n(Γ,p0)∣≤L∣p−p0∣/(πd2), and the winding number is locally constant on the complement of the trace. (The winding number is locally constant by an integral estimate).

[F3]

If K⊆C is compact, then C∖K has exactly one unbounded connected component and every other component is bounded. (The complement of a compact plane set has exactly one unbounded connected component).

[F4]

The connected components of a topological space are nonempty, pairwise disjoint, cover the space, and each is closed in the space. (The components of a space are its maximal connected subsets, they partition it, and each of them is closed).

[F5]

The connected components of an open subset of Rn are open and polygonally connected. (Every connected component of an open subset of Rn is open and polygonally connected).

[F6]

For n≥1, Rn is polygonally connected and connected and is locally path-connected. (Rn is polygonally connected, connected, locally path-connected and locally connected).

[F8]

A function continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b) satisfies f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a) for some interior point c. (The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a)).

[F9]

A continuous real function on a connected space has order-convex image and attains every intermediate value. (A real-valued continuous map on a connected space has order-convex image, so it takes every value between any two of its values).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF7

Orient c(S1) by the parameter; since S1 is a closed bounded subset of the plane it is compact by [F7], any open cover of c(S1) pulls back along the continuous bijection c to an open cover of S1, so c(S1) is compact, and it is closed in the plane.

2.1F8F9step 1.1

At a smooth edge point choose linear coordinates with the tangent horizontal; the first coordinate has nonzero derivative along the edge, so after shrinking it has one sign, [F8] makes it strictly monotone, [F9] shows its image is an interval, and its inverse is C1 by the difference quotient and the derivative lower bound, exhibiting the curve as a local graph; at a corner let u be the outgoing directed unit tangent and v the incoming directed unit tangent. The geometric incident rays point along u and −v, so their distinctness excludes v=−u. Thus the coordinate ξ(w)=⟨w,u+v⟩ has rate 1+⟨u,v⟩>0 along both branches, so both are C1 graphs over ξ with the corner as common endpoint and disjoint ξ-ranges and their union is one local graph, and no opposite-directed tangent case remains under the hypothesis. A small disk about the corner meets the curve in two arcs meeting only at the corner and its complement in that disk has exactly two connected components; every sufficiently short parameter arc has image open in c(S1), so inside the corresponding ambient open set one chooses an ambient disk in which the curve portion is exactly this local model and whose complement has exactly two connected sides; the finitely many such parameter arcs cover S1, and compactness of S1 yields a finite subcover. Shrink the side rectangles using positive separation of the images of compact nonadjacent parameter arcs; then every overlap near the curve concerns compatible adjacent arc charts and cannot interchange the oriented sides.

3.1step 2.1

The overlap graph of this finite cover is connected, since otherwise the unions of parameter arcs in its two vertex classes would be disjoint nonempty closed subsets covering the connected circle; whenever two parameter arcs overlap, their rectangles overlap near a common curve point and the left-side patches, respectively the right-side patches, meet there because both are the same oriented side of the same local graph, so the unions V+ and V− of all left and right patches are connected subsets of the complement and every curve point is approached from each side.

4.1F1F2step 3.1

At a smooth edge point p with unit tangent τ use the oriented coordinate w=τˉ(z−p): the defining integral is unchanged because dw/(w−w0)=dz/(z−z0) when w0=τˉ(z0−p), so the local jump lemma [F1] gives different winding numbers on the two side unions near p, while the local estimate [F2] makes the winding number constant on each connected side; hence V+ and V− lie in two distinct connected components of the complement.

5.1F4F5F6step 4.1

Let U be any component of the open complement; U is closed in the complement by [F4], open in the plane and polygonally connected by [F5], and its boundary is contained in the curve and is nonempty, because otherwise U would be a nonempty proper clopen subset of the connected plane, contradicting [F6]; at a boundary point the local graph patch has exactly two connected sides, and since U meets one of them and an open connected side inside U cannot meet the other, the whole side lies in U, identifying U with one of the two global collar-side components; hence the complement has at most two components, and at least two by step 4.1.

6.1F3step 5.1∎

The local sides of V+ and V− approach every curve point and no component boundary lies off the curve, so the curve is the boundary of both components, and by [F3] exactly one of them is unbounded while the other is bounded; all choices in the collar construction are finite, and neither the Jordan-Brouwer theorem, the Jordan-Schonflies theorem, nor any choice axiom is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

74 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources