Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

C¹ Euclidean maximal flows, variational dependence and the finite C² upgrade

Statement

Let U⊂R^n be open and Y:U→R^n be C¹. There is a unique maximal flow Φ on an open domain D⊂R×U containing {0}×U, and Φ is jointly C¹. Its time slices are local C¹ diffeomorphisms with inverse Φ_{−t}; ∂tΦ=Y(Φ) and DpΦ is the unique solution V of V′=DY(Φ)V, V(0)=I. Each regular point has a C¹ flow box. If Y is C², Φ and those flow boxes are C²; the second state variation W satisfies W′=DY(Φ)W+D2Y(Φ)[Vei,Vej], W(0)=0. Individual trajectories of a C¹ field are C² in time. A trajectory remaining in a compact K⊂⊂U cannot have a finite maximal endpoint. These Euclidean conclusions use no full AC or DC.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open set U⊆Rn and a C1 vector field Y:U→Rn.

[F1]

If F is continuous and locally Lipschitz in the state variable and the cylinder [t0−h,t0+h]×B‾(x0,r) lies in the open domain with ∥F∥2≤M, state-Lipschitz constant L, hM≤r and Lh<1, then a unique solution of the initial value problem exists on [t0−h,t0+h] with graph in the cylinder. (Picard-Lindelöf local existence and uniqueness for first-order systems).

[F2]

Near fixed data the Picard-Lindelof solutions exist on one common compact time interval and depend jointly uniformly continuously on initial time, initial state and parameters, with the explicit exponential estimate ∥x(t)−y(t)∥2≤eLH(∥x0−y0∥2+M∣s−t0∣+Hω(∥λ−μ∥2)). (Continuous dependence of ODE solutions on initial data and parameters).

[F3]

If u≥0 satisfies u(t)≤a(t)+∫t0tb(s)u(s) ds with continuous a,b and b≥0, then u(t)≤a(t)+∫t0ta(s)b(s)exp⁡(∫stb(r) dr) ds, and for constant a=A, b=B this gives u(t)≤AeB∣t−t0∣. (Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients).

[F5]

If U⊆Rn is open, f:U→Rn is C1 and Df(a) is invertible, then f is a local diffeomorphism at a with a C1 inverse g satisfying Dg(y)=Df(g(y))−1. (The Euclidean inverse function theorem).

[F6]

A C2 map with invertible derivative at a point has a C2 local inverse. (C² inverses and scalar return roots).

[F7]

For real a<b, a real-valued function continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b) satisfies f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a) for some c∈(a,b). (The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1given

All assertions are local in the state point and the time, so it suffices to work on a cylinder [−h,h]×B with B a compact convex set with B‾⊂U; on such a cylinder the mean value theorem [F7] applied componentwise bounds ∥Y∥≤M and makes Y Lipschitz in the state variable with one constant L, and one chooses h>0 with hM below the margin and Lh<1.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

By the quantitative clause of [F1] each initial point of the cylinder carries a unique local solution on [−h,h], obtained from the Picard iteration that starts at the specified constant curve and is generated by ordinary recursion, and the estimate of [F2] makes these local solutions depend uniformly continuously on the initial state.

3.1F3step 2.1

Subtracting the Volterra equations of two solutions through nearby initial points p,p+u and writing Au(t)=∫01DY(Φ(t,p)+r(Φ(t,p+u)−Φ(t,p))) dr gives a linear integral equation for the difference, and the uniform continuity of DY on the cylinder makes Au→DY(Φ(⋅,p)) uniformly; the variational equation V=I+∫DY(Φ)V has a unique solution on each fixed compact time interval by the same local Picard argument for linear equations together with the exponential bound of [F3], and subtracting V(t)u from the solution difference and applying [F3] gives an error of order o(∣u∣) uniformly in t; hence DpΦ=V, the same estimate at nearby p makes V continuous, and ∂tΦ=Y(Φ) is continuous, so Φ is jointly C1.

4.1F3step 3.1

If Y is C2 then C(t,p)=DY(Φ(t,p)) is C1 in p with derivative D2Y(Φ)DpΦ; difference quotients of V solve inhomogeneous linear integral equations, and the same uniform-continuity and Gronwall remainder argument converges to the solution W of W′=CW+D2Y(Φ)[Vei,Vej], W(0)=0, continuous in (t,p), so Dp2Φ exists continuously; the mixed derivative is DY(Φ)DpΦ and the second time derivative is DY(Φ)Y(Φ), giving joint C2 regularity, while for a C1 field a single trajectory is C2 in time because x′=Y(x) can be differentiated once.

4.2F5F6step 3.1

At a point with Y(q)≠0 choose a fixed linear transversal σ to Y(q); the derivative of (t,z)↦Φ(t,σ(z)) at the corresponding point is invertible because its time derivative is Y(q)≠0 and its spatial part spans the transversal, so [F5] makes it a local C1 diffeomorphism onto a C1 flow box, and when Y is C2 the same map is C2 and [F6] makes its inverse C2.

5.1step 2.1step 4.1

Uniqueness glues the local solutions into a maximal flow Φ on an open domain D satisfying the flow law: covering a compact solution segment by finitely many of the common local cylinders of step 2.1 and composing them proves openness of D and the stated C1 regularity, respectively C2 regularity when Y is C2, and the flow law inverts the time slices: Φ−t is the inverse of Φt.

6.1F4step 2.1step 5.1∎

Finally, if a trajectory remains in a compact set K with K⊂U and its maximal endpoint T were finite, then the bound ∥Y∥≤M on a compact cylinder containing K gives ∥x(t)−x(s)∥≤M∣t−s∣, so x(t) has a limit in K as t→T by the completeness of [F4], and the local existence clause of step 2.1 restarts the solution past T, contradicting maximality; only ordinary recursion, the stated Gronwall and uniform-continuity estimates and the local inverse theorem are used, so no dependent choice or full choice principle is invoked.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

94 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources