Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The winding number jumps by one across a regular planar arc

Statement

Let Γ be an oriented closed piecewise-C1 contour. Suppose that near 0 it contains exactly one regular C1 arc, traversed once with positive real tangent, and that the remaining contour is a compact set disjoint from 0. Then for all sufficiently small ε>0, the points iε and −iε avoid Γ and n(Γ,iε)−n(Γ,−iε)=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An oriented closed piecewise-C1 contour Γ that near 0 contains exactly one regular C1 arc, traversed once with positive real tangent, the remaining part of the contour being compact and disjoint from 0.

[F1]

For a closed complex contour γ and a point p off its trace, n(γ,p)=12πi∫γdzz−p. (The winding number of a closed contour about a point off its trace).

[F2]

For continuous f,g on the trace of a rectifiable contour γ and α,β∈C, ∫γ(αf+βg) dz=α∫γf dz+β∫γg dz. (Complex line integrals are linear in the integrand).

[F3]

Complex line integrals over piecewise-C1 paths are unchanged by an orientation-preserving piecewise-C1 reparametrization. (Scalar line integrals are parametrization-independent; vector line integrals retain orientation and change sign when it reverses).

[F4]

If ∣f(z)∣≤M on the trace of a rectifiable contour γ with M≥0, then ∣∫γf(z) dz∣≤ML(γ). (ML estimate: a contour integral is bounded by a supremum bound times path length).

[F5]

For a closed complex contour γ and a point p off its trace, n(γ,p)∈Z. (The winding number of a closed contour is an integer).

[F6]

For real a<b, a real-valued function continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b) satisfies f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a) for some c∈(a,b). (The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a)).

[F7]

A continuous real function on a connected space has order-convex image and attains every intermediate value. (A real-valued continuous map on a connected space has order-convex image, so it takes every value between any two of its values).

[F8]

For every real x, ddxarctan⁡x=11+x2. (Principal arctangent: derivative, integral, power series, and the Gregory–Leibniz series).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1given

Write the regular arc near 0 as z(t)=x(t)+iy(t) on a parameter interval [−δ,δ], with t=0 corresponding to 0, so x(0)=y(0)=0 and after an orientation-preserving affine change of parameter the positive real tangent gives x′(0)=1, y′(0)=0.

2.1F6F7step 1.1

Shrink δ so that x′≥1/2 on the interval; then [F6] makes the real part strictly increasing, [F7] shows its image contains a symmetric interval [−a,a] about zero; restrict the arc to the preimage of this interval, and the inverse x↦t(x) is C1 with derivative 1/x′(t(x)) by the difference quotient and the positive lower bound; hence the arc is a graph z(x)=x+if(x) for ∣x∣≤a with f(0)=f′(0)=0, and after shrinking a further one has ∣z′(x)∣≤2 and ∣f(x)∣≤η∣x∣ for a fixed 0<η<1/2.

2.2F4step 1.1

The parameter pieces outside the local arc form a compact set disjoint from 0; for each parameter t in it continuity of the contour gives a relative interval on which ∣z∣ exceeds half its positive value at t, the family of all these intervals covers the compact parameter set, so finitely many cover it, and the minimum of the finitely many positive half-values is a number d>0 with ∣z∣≥d on the remainder.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2

If ε<d/2 then ∣z∣≥d>ε on the remainder, so iε and −iε avoid the remainder, and they avoid the arc because its real coordinate vanishes only at x=0, where z(0)=0; hence both points lie off the trace of Γ.

4.1F1F2F3step 3.1

By the winding definition, linearity and orientation-preserving reparametrization, n(Γ,iε)−n(Γ,−iε)=12πi∫Γ2iεz2+ε2 dz, the integrand being continuous on the trace of Γ for these values of ε.

5.1F4step 4.1

On the remainder ∣z2+ε2∣=∣z−iε∣∣z+iε∣≥d2/4, so the ML estimate bounds the contribution of the remainder to the integral of step 4.1 by a constant times ε.

5.2F4F8step 4.1

On the local graph one has ∣z(x)−iε∣∣z(x)+iε∣≥c(x2+ε2) for a constant c>0: for ∣x∣≥ε each factor is at least ∣x∣, while for ∣x∣<ε the bound ∣f(x)∣≤η∣x∣<ε/2 gives ∣z(x)±iε∣≥ε/2; substituting x=εu turns the local contribution into ∫−a/εa/ε2iz′(εu)(z(εu)/ε)2+1 du, whose integrand converges uniformly on bounded u-intervals to 2i1+u2 and is dominated by C/(1+u2), so the tails are uniformly of order 1/R outside [−R,R] and the integral tends to ∫R2i du1+u2=4ilim⁡R→∞arctan⁡R=2πi by [F8]; hence the index difference tends to 1.

6.1F5step 5.1step 5.2∎

Each winding number is an integer by [F5], so the difference n(Γ,iε)−n(Γ,−iε) is an integer for every sufficiently small ε>0; since it tends to 1 by steps 5.1 and 5.2, it equals 1 for all sufficiently small ε.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

85 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources