Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A nested pinched center frontier has a strict inner-disk search

Statement

Suppose the frontier of a center basin is two simple homoclinic loops through the same saddle q, with one loop nested inside the other. Their inner bounded disk K occupies one saddle quadrant, contains a center, and does not contain the selected basin center. Searching from any center of K remains inside K. If another nested two-loop frontier occurs in that search, its inner disk K′ is properly contained in K and has strictly fewer interior saddles. This is a selection statement in the original source disk; it does not assign an essential boundary class to K.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A generic characteristic disk with a selected center basin whose frontier is two simple homoclinic loops of the characteristic field through the same nondegenerate saddle q, the inner loop nested inside the outer one, with inner bounded disk K; K lies in one saddle quadrant of q, does not contain the selected basin center, and its own field restricts to it.

[F1]

A simple directed one-quadrant homoclinic disk of a nondegenerate saddle has one more strict-interior center than strict-interior saddles, and therefore contains a center (the sibling item lem-one-quadrant-homoclinic-disk-has-one-more-interior-center-than-saddle). No additional saddle-sector classification is attributed to this count.

[F2]

A finitely cornered simple regular plane curve separates the plane into a bounded and an unbounded component, without choice (A finitely cornered regular plane curve separates without choice).

[F3]

Trajectories of the characteristic field are uniquely determined by their initial points, so a trajectory cannot cross an invariant set such as a union of trajectories, and the interior of a Jordan disk bounded by trajectories is invariant under the field's local flow wherever the field is regular.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

The given inner disk K is bounded by the simple directed inner homoclinic loop and occupies one saddle quadrant at q. These are exactly the hypotheses of [F1], so cK−sK=1 and there is a center c strictly inside K. The boundary saddle q is not counted. No half-branch classification is needed for this application.

2.1F1step 1.1given

The selected basin center does not lie in K by hypothesis, so the center c found in step 1.1 is a center different from the selected one; the search that starts from c is therefore a search in a strictly smaller region of the source disk.

3.1F2F3step 2.1

The boundary ∂K is a union of trajectories, hence invariant; by uniqueness of trajectories [F3] no regular trajectory crosses it. Consequently every nested periodic disk around c lies inside K: its frontier cannot reach the exterior of K without crossing ∂K, and if its frontier reaches ∂K it must coincide with one of the two boundary circuits, which is the original single circuit rather than a new nested two-loop frontier.

4.1F1F2step 3.1

Let a new nested two-loop frontier occur in the search from c; by step 3.1 its two loops, and in particular its saddle r, lie in K, and it cannot be the original frontier, so r is strictly interior to K. Its inner disk K′ is bounded by its inner loop and, by [F2], is the bounded component of the complement of that loop; since the loop lies in the interior region swept by the search and K′ is the smaller bounded side, K′⊆K and r∉K′. Every saddle interior to K′ is then interior to K, while the interior saddle r of K is not available inside K′; hence the number of interior saddles of K′ is strictly smaller than that of K.

5.1F1F2F3step 4.1∎

Collecting steps 1.1-4.1, a search from any center of K remains inside K, and every nested two-loop frontier encountered has an inner disk properly contained in K with strictly fewer interior saddles; no essential boundary class was used or assigned to K, and only the two cited suppliers and the local uniqueness of trajectories were consumed.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources