How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Characteristic-disk singular images can be separated into distinct leaves relative to the boundary collar
Statement
Assume Countable Choice (The countable-choice principle used in the foliation pair). Let be a cooriented codimension-one foliation of a smooth -manifold with nowhere-vanishing defining form , and let be a map whose characteristic covector is nowhere vanishing on the closure of a prescribed collar of and has finitely many interior zeros , all nondegenerate, each a center or a saddle. Then for every sufficiently small prescribed neighbourhood of there is a map in that neighbourhood, together with a homotopy from to fixed on an open neighbourhood of , such that:
(i) the singular points of are exactly , and near each the local transverse function of differs from that of by a constant, so the transverse-coordinate Hessian and the center/saddle type are unchanged;
(ii) the images lie in pairwise distinct ambient leaves of .
In particular has no characteristic separatrix joining two distinct singular points; homoclinic separatrices are not excluded.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A cooriented codimension-one foliation with defining form , a map regular on the closure of a prescribed collar of , and finitely many nondegenerate characteristic zeros in the interior of .
In a foliation chart with transverse coordinate one has with , so the characteristic zero set of a map in the chart is the critical set of , and adding a constant to on an open set does not change the critical points or the Hessian there (Transversely oriented codimension-one foliations, The chain rule for total derivatives: ).
Let be a foliation on a second-countable manifold, a leaf and a vertical transverse interval in a foliation box; then is at most countable (A C² leaf meets a local box transversal in at most countably many points).
For both and are uncountable, so no countable subset of an interval equals the interval (Every nondegenerate interval of is uncountable).
For a compact set contained in an open set of a smooth manifold there is a smooth bump equal to on a neighbourhood of and supported in (A manifold bump for a compact set inside an open set).
Proof
The compact set contains no zero of . Thus each lies in the open set ; choose pairwise disjoint open disks with closures in that set, with , and slightly smaller compact cores around . Since the are the only zeros, and a nondegenerate zero is isolated, we may choose the so that on . Shrinking the further, arrange that each lies in a single foliation chart with transverse coordinate , and write . Process the indices in the order .
A bump on each disk and its margin. By [F4] choose for each a smooth bump with , equal to on a neighbourhood of and supported in . On the compact set , which is disjoint from , the form is nowhere zero; by compactness there is with there.
Avoiding the finitely many earlier singular leaves. Write . The curve for parametrizes a vertical transverse interval through in the box . For each , the map has already been replaced near by a map whose singular image is fixed in the -th stage; its leaf meets the interval in at most countably many points by [F2]. The finitely many countable sets have a countable union, while is uncountable [F3]; choose with so small that avoids all the earlier singular leaves and the endpoint of , and . Only finitely many such choices are made in the whole construction.
The local modification preserves the singular set. Define the modified map on by , where are the foliation-box coordinates, and let outside , with ; since is compactly supported in the interior of , all derivatives agree across , so is a map of the disk equal to near the collar. On the neighbourhood of where the transverse function is , whose critical set and Hessian agree with those of by [F1], so the singular point survives with its type unchanged. On one has with , so the differential does not vanish and no new zero appears; outside the map is unchanged and its zeros are the previously handled ones.
Distinct leaves. At the end of stage the singular image of is ; in the coordinates of the box its transverse coordinate is , and by step 3.1 this value avoids the leaves of the singular images of all ; since the later modifications are supported in with and , they do not move the image of . Applying this for every , the final images lie in pairwise distinct leaves.
Assembling the homotopy. Define by for , and outside . The disks are disjoint, so this is well defined; every vanishes on an open neighbourhood of , so the local formulas equal there for every and glue to a jointly map by the chain rule. Thus and , and the complement of the finite compact union is an open neighbourhood of fixed throughout. In chart coordinates the norm of each endpoint modification is bounded by ; composition with the fixed chart inverse is continuous in on a compact chart neighbourhood, as follows by applying the chain rule twice and uniform continuity of its derivatives there. Choose the within the finitely many chart margins and norm bounds as well as the inequalities of step 3.1, so all interpolated chart points remain in and lies in the prescribed neighbourhood. For take . Step 4.1 gives (i), and step 5.1 gives (ii).
Finally, a characteristic separatrix joining two distinct singular points is a trajectory of the characteristic field on which the local transverse coordinate is constant, so its endpoints are two singular images lying in one leaf; assertion (ii) therefore excludes such a separatrix, while a homoclinic separatrix begins and ends at the same singularity and is not excluded. The only infinite selection in the proof is the countable union in step 3.1, which uses exactly the stated through the leaf-intersection lemma [F2]; every other choice is finite.
Depends on
- Relative generic position for characteristic disk maps
- A C² leaf meets a local box transversal in at most countably many points
- A manifold bump for a compact set inside an open set
- Every nondegenerate interval of $\mathbb{R}$ is uncountable
- The countable-choice principle used in the foliation pair
- The chain rule for total derivatives: $D(g\circ f)(a)=Dg(f(a))\circ Df(a)$
- Transversely oriented codimension-one foliations
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- S. P. Novikov, The Topology of Foliations (English translation by J. A. Zilber) (standard reference, not scraped)