Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Characteristic-disk singular images can be separated into distinct leaves relative to the boundary collar

Statement

Assume Countable Choice ACω (The countable-choice principle used in the foliation pair). Let F be a C2 cooriented codimension-one foliation of a smooth 3-manifold with nowhere-vanishing defining form ω, and let h:D2→M be a C2 map whose characteristic covector h∗ω is nowhere vanishing on the closure C‾ of a prescribed collar C of ∂D2 and has finitely many interior zeros p1,…,pN, all nondegenerate, each a center or a saddle. Then for every sufficiently small prescribed C2 neighbourhood of h there is a C2 map h′ in that neighbourhood, together with a C2 homotopy from h to h′ fixed on an open neighbourhood of C, such that:

(i) the singular points of h′ are exactly p1,…,pN, and near each pi the local transverse function of h′ differs from that of h by a constant, so the transverse-coordinate Hessian and the center/saddle type are unchanged;

(ii) the images h′(p1),…,h′(pN) lie in pairwise distinct ambient leaves of F.

In particular h′ has no characteristic separatrix joining two distinct singular points; homoclinic separatrices are not excluded.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A cooriented codimension-one C2 foliation with defining form ω, a C2 map h:D2→M regular on the closure C‾ of a prescribed collar C of ∂D2, and finitely many nondegenerate characteristic zeros p1,…,pN in the interior of D2.

[F1]

In a foliation chart with transverse coordinate z one has ω=a dz with a≠0, so the characteristic zero set of a map g in the chart is the critical set of u=z∘g, and adding a constant to u on an open set does not change the critical points or the Hessian there (Transversely oriented codimension-one foliations, The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)).

[F2]

Let F be a C2 foliation on a second-countable manifold, L a leaf and τ:J→Q a vertical transverse interval in a foliation box; then τ−1(L) is at most countable (A C² leaf meets a local box transversal in at most countably many points).

[F3]

For a<b both [a,b] and (a,b) are uncountable, so no countable subset of an interval equals the interval (Every nondegenerate interval of R is uncountable).

[F4]

For a compact set K contained in an open set W of a smooth manifold there is a smooth bump ρ equal to 1 on a neighbourhood of K and supported in W (A manifold bump for a compact set inside an open set).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F3

The compact set C‾ contains no zero of h∗ω. Thus each pi lies in the open set int⁡D2∖C‾; choose pairwise disjoint open disks Vi with closures in that set, with pi∈Vi, and slightly smaller compact cores Wi⊂Vi around pi. Since the pi are the only zeros, and a nondegenerate zero is isolated, we may choose the Vi so that h∗ω≠0 on V‾i∖Wi. Shrinking the Vi further, arrange that each h(V‾i) lies in a single foliation chart Qi with transverse coordinate zi, and write ui:=zi∘h. Process the indices in the order i=1,…,N.

2.1step 1.1F4

A bump on each disk and its margin. By [F4] choose for each i a smooth bump ρi with 0≤ρi≤1, equal to 1 on a neighbourhood of Wi and supported in Vi. On the compact set supp⁡(dρi), which is disjoint from Wi, the form dui is nowhere zero; by compactness there is ηi>0 with ∣dui∣≥ηi there.

3.1step 2.1F2F3

Avoiding the finitely many earlier singular leaves. Write (Yi,ui)=χi∘h. The curve τi(t)=χi−1(Yi(pi),ui(pi)+t) for ∣t∣<εi parametrizes a vertical transverse interval Ji through h(pi) in the box Qi. For each j<i, the map h has already been replaced near pj by a map whose singular image qj is fixed in the j-th stage; its leaf Lj meets the interval Ji in at most countably many points by [F2]. The finitely many countable sets {zi(qj′):qj′∈Ji∩Lj} have a countable union, while Ji is uncountable [F3]; choose δi with ∣δi∣ so small that ui(pi)+δi avoids all the earlier singular leaves and the endpoint of Ji, and ∣δi∣sup⁡∣dρi∣<ηi/2. Only finitely many such choices are made in the whole construction.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1F1

The local modification preserves the singular set. Define the modified map hi on Vi by hi=χi−1(Yi,ui+δiρi), where (Yi,ui)=χi∘h are the foliation-box coordinates, and let hi=hi−1 outside Vi, with h0=h; since ρi is compactly supported in the interior of Vi, all derivatives agree across ∂Vi, so hi is a C2 map of the disk equal to h near the collar. On the neighbourhood of Wi where ρi=1 the transverse function is ui+δi, whose critical set and Hessian agree with those of ui by [F1], so the singular point pi survives with its type unchanged. On supp⁡(dρi) one has d(ui+δiρi)=dui+δi dρi with ∣dui∣≥ηi>∣δi∣sup⁡∣dρi∣, so the differential does not vanish and no new zero appears; outside Vi the map is unchanged and its zeros are the previously handled ones.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1

Distinct leaves. At the end of stage i the singular image of pi is hi(pi); in the coordinates of the box Qi its transverse coordinate is ui(pi)+δi, and by step 3.1 this value avoids the leaves Lj of the singular images of all j<i; since the later modifications are supported in Vj with j>i and Vi∩Vj=∅, they do not move the image of pi. Applying this for every i, the final images h′(p1),…,h′(pN) lie in pairwise distinct leaves.

6.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1F1

Assembling the homotopy. Define H:D2×[0,1]→M by H(x,s)=χi−1(Yi(x),ui(x)+sδiρi(x)) for x∈Vi, and H(x,s)=h(x) outside ⋃iVi. The disks are disjoint, so this is well defined; every ρi vanishes on an open neighbourhood of ∂Vi, so the local formulas equal h(x) there for every s and glue to a jointly C2 map by the chain rule. Thus H(⋅,0)=h and H(⋅,1)=h′, and the complement of the finite compact union ⋃isupp⁡ρi is an open neighbourhood of C‾ fixed throughout. In chart coordinates the C2 norm of each endpoint modification is bounded by ∣δi∣∥ρi∥C2; composition with the fixed C2 chart inverse is continuous in C2 on a compact chart neighbourhood, as follows by applying the chain rule twice and uniform continuity of its derivatives there. Choose the δi within the finitely many chart margins and norm bounds as well as the inequalities of step 3.1, so all interpolated chart points remain in Qi and h′ lies in the prescribed C2 neighbourhood. For N=0 take H(x,s)=h(x). Step 4.1 gives (i), and step 5.1 gives (ii).

7.1step 5.1step 6.1F2∎

Finally, a characteristic separatrix joining two distinct singular points is a trajectory of the characteristic field on which the local transverse coordinate is constant, so its endpoints are two singular images lying in one leaf; assertion (ii) therefore excludes such a separatrix, while a homoclinic separatrix begins and ends at the same singularity and is not excluded. The only infinite selection in the proof is the countable union in step 3.1, which uses exactly the stated ACω through the leaf-intersection lemma [F2]; every other choice is finite.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources