Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The finite-holonomy normal model of the Möbius band

Example

Assume Countable Choice ACω (The countable-choice principle used in the foliation pair). Let M:=(S1×(−1,1))/Z2 be the Möbius band, the quotient by the free involution τ(u,v):=(u+12,−v), foliated by the images of the circles S1×{v}. The central leaf L0 (image of v=0) is the circle R/(12Z) whose holonomy group is Z2, generated by the reflection germ v↦−v of a transversal interval: going once around the central leaf identifies the transversal coordinate v with −v (The holonomy representation and the holonomy group of a leaf). Its holonomy cover is the connected double cover L^0=S1→L0 (The holonomy cover of a leaf), the deck group is Z2 acting by u↦u+12, and the finite-holonomy normal model (L^0×D)/Z2 with the diagonal action (u,v)↦(u+12,−v) is exactly the Möbius band with its foliation: the quotient recovers the surface and the central leaf (L^0×{0})/Z2≅L0. The other leaves are images of S1×{v} and double-cover the central leaf, as predicted by the finite-holonomy model.

Verification

Given: The involution τ(u,v)=(u+12,−v) on S1×(−1,1) with S1=R/Z, the product foliation by the slices S1×{v}, and the quotient M.

[F1] A free properly discontinuous action by diffeomorphisms preserving a regular foliation descends the foliation to the quotient, whose leaves are the images of the leaves (The quotient foliation under a free and properly discontinuous foliated action).

[F2] The holonomy representation of a leaf and the holonomy cover with deck group isomorphic to the holonomy group are as in The holonomy representation and the holonomy group of a leaf, The holonomy cover of a leaf and The deck group of the holonomy cover is the holonomy group.

[F3] The finite-holonomy normal model is the diagonal quotient (L^×D)/H with the deck action on the holonomy cover and the holonomy action on the invariant transverse disk (The finite-holonomy normal model of a compact leaf).

Proof technique: direct verification.

1.1F1

(The quotient is the Möbius band.) The map τ is an involution: τ2(u,v)=τ(u+12,−v)=(u+1,v)=(u,v) in S1=R/Z. It is free: τ(u,v)=(u,v) would give v=−v, hence v=0, and then u=u+12, impossible in S1=R/Z; since S1×(−1,1) is a surface and the action is free and properly discontinuous, the quotient M is a smooth surface. It is the total space of the interval bundle over S1=R/(12Z) with monodromy v↦−v, the non-trivial interval bundle, i.e. the Möbius band.

1.2F1F2

(The foliation descends and the holonomy is Z2.) The involution carries the slice S1×{v} onto S1×{−v}, so the product foliation is preserved and descends to a codimension-one foliation of M whose leaves are the images of the slices [F1]. The image of S1×{0} is the central leaf L0=R/(12Z); following it once around means passing from u to u+12, and the identification in the quotient returns the transversal coordinate v to −v, so the return germ is the reflection v↦−v and the holonomy group is Z2 [F2].

2.1F2F3step 1.2

(The holonomy cover and the normal model.) The holonomy cover of L0 is the connected double cover L^0=S1→L0 with deck group Z2 acting by u↦u+12 [F2]. With D a small invariant transversal interval and the diagonal action (u,v)↦(u+12,−v), the finite-holonomy normal model (L^0×D)/Z2 is the quotient of S1×D by exactly the involution τ restricted to S1×D, hence equals the Möbius band over D with the descended foliation; the central leaf is (L^0×{0})/Z2≅L0 [F3].

3.1F1F3step 2.1∎

(The other leaves.) For v≠0, the map u↦[(u,v)] from S1 to the quotient leaf is injective: the only nonidentity group element changes v to −v. It parametrizes that entire leaf, because the other slice at −v has the same image. Under the model retraction to L0=R/(12Z) its projection is u mod Z↦u mod (12Z), a double covering. In a fixed local transverse fibre the two leaf intersections at v and −v are distinct points; they are not identified in that fibre. This is exactly the stabilizer calculation [H:Hv]=2 for Hv={1}.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

63 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources