Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The holonomy representation and the holonomy group of a leaf

Definition

Assume Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let F be a regular foliation of M, let L be a leaf (Leaves of a regular foliation), let x∈L, and let T be a local transversal to F at x (Local transversals to a regular foliation). Equip L with the unique intrinsic smooth manifold structure of its maximal connected integral manifold of TF (Regular foliations and integrable distributions correspond, Existence and uniqueness of maximal connected integral manifolds). This topology, rather than the ambient subspace topology, defines π1(L,x). The leaf inclusion is smooth and continuous, so intrinsic leaf loops and endpoint-fixed homotopies are leafwise paths and homotopies in M.

Since T is a smooth manifold, the germs at x of local diffeomorphisms T→T form the group Diff⁡x(T) (Germs of local diffeomorphisms at a point, Germs of local diffeomorphisms at a point form a group).

The holonomy representation of L at x relative to T is ρx:π1(L,x)→Diff⁡x(T),ρx([a]):=ha−1(T,T), where a is a based loop in the intrinsic leaf topology (Based loops and the fundamental group, Leafwise paths and leafwise homotopy relative to endpoints). The inverse is essential: the library product [a][b]=[a∗b] traverses a first, whereas ordinary composition of germs applies the rightmost map first. Homotopy invariance and reversal therefore give ρx([a][b])=(hb∘ha)−1=ha−1∘hb−1=ρx([a])∘ρx([b]) (Holonomy depends only on leafwise homotopy relative to endpoints, Holonomy respects path concatenation and reversal). Thus ρx is a homomorphism. The unreversed map [a]↦ha(T,T) is an antihomomorphism with the same image and kernel. The holonomy group of L at x is the image Hol⁡(L,x):=ρx(π1(L,x))≤Diff⁡x(T), a subgroup of the group of germs in the sense of Subgroup and Group and abelian group.

Replacing T by another local transversal T1 at x replaces ρx by a conjugate homomorphism: with α the germ of the transport across the plaque at x from T1 to T, one has ρxT1([a])=α−1∘ρxT([a])∘α for every leaf loop a. Indeed, viewing the loop a as the concatenation of the constant path at x, then a, then the constant path at x, the concatenation law gives exactly this formula, with the constant-path germs supplying α and α−1 (Holonomy respects path concatenation and reversal). It follows that the kernel of ρx and the conjugacy class of the holonomy group are intrinsic to the leaf and do not depend on the choice of the local transversal T. The representative ρx itself does depend on T.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

66 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources