How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The holonomy representation and the holonomy group of a leaf
Definition
Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be a regular foliation of , let be a leaf (Leaves of a regular foliation), let , and let be a local transversal to at (Local transversals to a regular foliation). Equip with the unique intrinsic smooth manifold structure of its maximal connected integral manifold of (Regular foliations and integrable distributions correspond, Existence and uniqueness of maximal connected integral manifolds). This topology, rather than the ambient subspace topology, defines . The leaf inclusion is smooth and continuous, so intrinsic leaf loops and endpoint-fixed homotopies are leafwise paths and homotopies in .
Since is a smooth manifold, the germs at of local diffeomorphisms form the group (Germs of local diffeomorphisms at a point, Germs of local diffeomorphisms at a point form a group).
The holonomy representation of at relative to is where is a based loop in the intrinsic leaf topology (Based loops and the fundamental group, Leafwise paths and leafwise homotopy relative to endpoints). The inverse is essential: the library product traverses first, whereas ordinary composition of germs applies the rightmost map first. Homotopy invariance and reversal therefore give (Holonomy depends only on leafwise homotopy relative to endpoints, Holonomy respects path concatenation and reversal). Thus is a homomorphism. The unreversed map is an antihomomorphism with the same image and kernel. The holonomy group of at is the image a subgroup of the group of germs in the sense of Subgroup and Group and abelian group.
Replacing by another local transversal at replaces by a conjugate homomorphism: with the germ of the transport across the plaque at from to , one has for every leaf loop . Indeed, viewing the loop as the concatenation of the constant path at , then , then the constant path at , the concatenation law gives exactly this formula, with the constant-path germs supplying and (Holonomy respects path concatenation and reversal). It follows that the kernel of and the conjugacy class of the holonomy group are intrinsic to the leaf and do not depend on the choice of the local transversal . The representative itself does depend on .
Depends on
- Germs of local diffeomorphisms at a point
- Germs of local diffeomorphisms at a point form a group
- A leafwise path determines a germ of a transverse diffeomorphism
- The holonomy germ is independent of the foliation chart chain
- Holonomy depends only on leafwise homotopy relative to endpoints
- Holonomy respects path concatenation and reversal
- Based loops and the fundamental group
- The homomorphism on fundamental groups induced by a pointed continuous map
- Local transversals to a regular foliation
- Leaves of a regular foliation
- Group and abelian group
- Subgroup
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Leafwise paths and leafwise homotopy relative to endpoints
- Regular foliations and integrable distributions correspond
- Existence and uniqueness of maximal connected integral manifolds
Used by
- Finiteness of the fundamental group is sufficient, but not necessary, for Reeb stability Corollary
- Trivial holonomy gives a product foliated neighbourhood Corollary
- A compact leaf with infinite fundamental group can still have trivial holonomy Counterexample
- A Reeb component has a compact boundary leaf with infinite holonomy Counterexample
- Two nonhomotopic leaf loops can have the same holonomy germ Counterexample
- Limit cycles of a leaf Definition
- The holonomy cover of a leaf Definition
- The finite-holonomy normal model of the Möbius band Example
- The Kronecker foliation of the torus has dense leaves and trivial leaf holonomy Example
- The Möbius band's central leaf has reflection holonomy Example
- A characteristic disk with essential boundary data produces a vanishing cycle Lemma
- A compact leafwise nullhomotopy persists under a transverse deformation Lemma
- A first saddle lobe admits a collar-fixed center-saddle cancellation Lemma
- A fixed leafwise cap gives a joint transverse product with exact collar data Lemma
- A nonzero pi class on a torus has a primitive embedded pi root Lemma
- A null characteristic frontier transports nullity to the adjacent annulus Lemma
- A null simple center frontier supplies the exact cancellation scalar Lemma
- A null-transversal disk has a minimal one-sided cycle Lemma
- A separated characteristic disk has a minimal nonidentity simple cycle Lemma
- Finite holonomy acts on a small transverse disk Lemma
- Fixed transverse fences and their finite crossing words Lemma
- In a transversely oriented codimension-one foliation a compact leaf with finite fundamental group has trivial holonomy Lemma
- Limitwise-nullhomotopy predicate descends to a normal subgroup Lemma
- One-sided trivial-holonomy classes form a normal subgroup Lemma
- The covering of a leaf associated with the holonomy kernel exists Lemma
- The deck group of the holonomy cover is the holonomy group Lemma
- Suspension holonomy is the germ of the represented monodromy action Proposition
- The isotropy of the holonomy groupoid is the leaf holonomy group Proposition
- A compact leaf neither has finite holonomy nor finite fundamental group automatically Remark
- Holonomy is a germ, not a globally defined return map Remark
Dependency tree · two levels
66 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Leiden NCG seminar, Noncommutative Geometry of Foliations (2023 seminar notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Danny Calegari, Foliations and the Geometry of 3-Manifolds (Oxford Mathematical Monographs) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Eckhard Meinrenken, Lie Groupoids and Lie Algebroids, lecture notes (University of Toronto MAT1341, Fall 2017) (standard reference, not scraped)