Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A leafwise path determines a germ of a transverse diffeomorphism

Statement

Assume Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let F be a regular foliation of a smooth manifold M, let a be a leafwise path from x to y (Leafwise paths and leafwise homotopy relative to endpoints), let T be a local transversal to F at x and T′ a local transversal to F at y (Local transversals to a regular foliation). Suppose 0=t0<⋯<tN=1 and foliation charts U1,…,UN satisfy a([ti−1,ti])⊆Ui, and choose local transversals Ti at a(ti) for i=1,…,N−1 with T0=T and TN=T′. Then the chart-wise transports along plaques compose to a germ of a local diffeomorphism ha:(T,x)→(T′,y), the holonomy germ of a along the displayed data (Germs of local diffeomorphisms at a point). Every leafwise path admits such a finite chart chain, so every leafwise path together with its endpoint transversals determines at least one such germ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A regular foliation F of M with tangent distribution D=TF, a leafwise path a:[0,1]→M from x to y, local transversals T at x and T′ at y, a subdivision 0=t0<⋯<tN=1, foliation charts U1,…,UN with a([ti−1,ti])⊆Ui, and local transversals Ti at a(ti) with T0=T, TN=T′.

[F1]

A regular foliation has an atlas of foliation charts φ=(x,y):U→Rk×Rq whose overlaps preserve the transverse coordinates; the connected components of the level sets y=c in U are the plaques of the chart, and they are integral manifolds of D (Regular foliation atlases, Plaques of a flat chart, Flat charts for a distribution, Leaves of a regular foliation).

[F2]

The tangent distribution D=TF is an integrable smooth distribution whose maximal connected integral manifolds are the leaves; in particular plaques are local integral manifolds of D (Regular foliations and integrable distributions correspond).

[F3]

A local transversal T to F at p is an embedded submanifold of dimension q with TpM=Dp⊕TpT (Local transversals to a regular foliation).

[F4]

If dGp is an isomorphism of tangent spaces, then G restricts to a diffeomorphism from an open neighbourhood of p onto an open neighbourhood of G(p) (The smooth inverse function theorem on manifolds).

[F7]

A germ of local diffeomorphisms from (M,x) to (N,y) is represented by a local diffeomorphism between open neighbourhoods, two representatives being equivalent when they agree near x (Germs of local diffeomorphisms at a point).

[F8]

Under the assumed Countable Choice, a leaf of F is a maximal connected integral manifold of D, with its intrinsic second-countable smooth manifold structure. Every connected integral manifold contained in it factors smoothly through it (Regular foliations and integrable distributions correspond, Existence and uniqueness of maximal connected integral manifolds).

[F9]

Every nondegenerate real interval is uncountable (Every nondegenerate interval of R is uncountable).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F3F6givenconstruct

A finite chart chain exists. The sets a−1(U), over foliation charts, cover [0,1]. By [F6] they have a Lebesgue number δ>0. Choose N with 1/N<δ and put ti=i/N. Each parameter interval [ti−1,ti] has diameter 1/N, so it is contained in some a−1(Ui); equivalently its image is contained in Ui. At an intermediate point a small slice {x=x(a(ti))} in a product foliation box is an embedded q-dimensional transversal, since its tangent space is complementary to D. Thus the required intermediate transversals exist. The subsequent argument applies also to any displayed admissible chain.

1.2F1F2F3F4F5construct

Transport inside one chart. Let p,p′ lie in one plaque of a foliation chart U with coordinates (x,y), and let S,S′ be local transversals at those points. The restriction of y to either transversal has invertible differential: its kernel is the intersection of the transversal tangent space with D=ker⁡dy, which is zero, and its source and target have dimension q. By [F4], shrink to neighborhoods A⊆S and B⊆S′ on which these restrictions are diffeomorphisms with the same open image about y(p)=y(p′). Then h=(y∣B)−1∘(y∣A) is a diffeomorphism matching transverse coordinates. It matches points in the same plaque of U after shrinking A,B: by [F5], connect x(p) to x(p′) by a polygonal path in the open slice at y(p). Its compact image has a finite cover by product boxes contained in the chart image; sufficiently small changes of the transverse value keep this path in those boxes. Short segments in the endpoint boxes connect it to x(u) and x(h(u)) for u near p. Thus u and h(u) lie in one connected level-set component. If the leaf dimension is zero, the plaque is a singleton and the same conclusion holds in a small transverse box.

2.1F4F7F8F9step 1.2givenconstruct

The chain composes. To establish the single-plaque assertion, give L the intrinsic structure of [F8]. Each plaque of Ui contained in L is open in L: its inclusion factors smoothly through L, with invertible differential since both tangent images equal D, so [F4] applies. Distinct plaques are disjoint, and an enumerated basis of L assigns to each plaque the least index of a nonempty basic set contained in it. Thus L meets at most countably many plaques of Ui and has at most countably many transverse values there. Each transverse coordinate of the connected continuous image a([ti−1,ti]) is constant: two distinct values would force a nondegenerate interval of values by connectedness, contradicting [F9]. The image is therefore a connected subset of one level set and lies in one connected component, hence in one plaque. Step 1.2 gives a transport germ hi:(Ti−1,a(ti−1))→(Ti,a(ti)). Shrink representatives successively so every composite is defined near its source point; then hN∘⋯∘h1 is a local diffeomorphism near x with value y. Its germ is the holonomy germ along the displayed data.

3.1F7step 1.1step 2.1∎

Conclusion. By steps 1.1 and 2.1 every leafwise path with its endpoint transversals and a chosen finite chart chain produces a germ ha:(T,x)→(T′,y) of a local diffeomorphism, namely the composition of the chart-wise plaque transports. Since a finite chart chain always exists by step 1.1, every leafwise path determines at least one such germ.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

106 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources