How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Kronecker foliation of the torus has dense leaves and trivial leaf holonomy
Example
Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let and let be the linear foliation of (The two-dimensional torus ) whose leaves are the images of the lines . Then every leaf is dense in , every leaf is diffeomorphic to , and the holonomy group of every point is trivial: for every leaf and the holonomy representation has trivial domain (The holonomy representation and the holonomy group of a leaf), so every leaf loop has the identity holonomy germ. In particular this foliation has dense leaves while its holonomy is as trivial as that of a product foliation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An irrational real number , the quotient torus with class map , and the foliation whose leaves are the images of the lines .
carries the quotient topology of , so a subset is open exactly when its preimage is open, the class map is continuous and open, and translations of by vectors of induce homeomorphisms of ; the open boxes are a basis (The two-dimensional torus , The quotient topology of a surjection, quotient maps, saturated sets, and the quotient of a space by an equivalence relation with its canonical projection).
If is a natural number and points are assigned to intervals of the form , then two of them lie in one interval (If then every has a fibre with more than elements, and for nonempty some fibre has at least elements, counting form with ).
The leaves of are the maximal connected integral manifolds of the distribution spanned by , they carry a unique smooth structure making the inclusion a connected injective immersion, and a leaf is connected and closed under the flow of the vector field (Existence and uniqueness of maximal connected integral manifolds, Leaves of a regular foliation).
Every nonempty convex subset of is simply connected; in particular (Every nonempty convex subset of is simply connected).
Holonomy germs are unchanged by leafwise homotopy relative to endpoints, and the holonomy representation sends the trivial class to the identity germ, its image being the holonomy group (Holonomy depends only on leafwise homotopy relative to endpoints, The holonomy germ is independent of the foliation chart chain, The holonomy representation and the holonomy group of a leaf).
Verification
The multiples of are dense. For consider the numbers , , where denotes the fractional part, and assign to the interval containing . By [F2] two of them, say , lie in the same interval, so . Hence there is an integer with and a real with : the difference lies within of an integer, and is its positive distance to the nearest integer, nonzero because is irrational.
Every leaf is diffeomorphic to . For a point consider , . It is continuous by [F1], its image is the leaf through , and it is injective: if with then , so and , forcing , contrary to hypothesis. Near any , the image of is, in a small box of the torus adapted to the constant vector field , the graph of a straight line over the first coordinate; hence is a local homeomorphism onto the leaf with the leaf topology and an immersion. By the uniqueness clause of [F3] the smooth structure on the leaf making the inclusion an immersion is unique, so is a diffeomorphism onto the leaf with its intrinsic structure.
The orbit of under the flow is dense. For any and as in step 1.1, choose the natural number with ; then . Since , there is an integer with in . As is arbitrary, the set is dense in .
The holonomy group of every leaf is trivial. Let be a leaf and . By step 1.2 and [F4], . Hence the holonomy representation is a homomorphism from the trivial group, so its image is the trivial subgroup of ; equivalently, the only leaf loop class is the trivial one and its germ is the identity germ, and every leaf loop — being null-homotopic — has identity holonomy germ by [F5].
Every leaf is dense. The leaf through contains the points , , so for a nonempty open box choose by step 2.1 an integer with in ; then gives , a point of the leaf through lying in the box, because and is within of modulo . Hence the leaf through is dense, and since translation by the class of is a homeomorphism of carrying the leaf through onto the leaf through by [F1], every leaf is dense.
Conclusion. Every leaf of is dense by step 3.1 and diffeomorphic to by step 1.2, and every leaf holonomy group is trivial by step 2.2. Thus dense leaves coexist with completely trivial holonomy.
Remarks
-
Density of the leaves is not detected by the holonomy groups. The product foliation of by circles also has trivial leaf holonomy, yet its leaves are closed; the Kronecker foliation shows that the holonomy group of a leaf says nothing about how the leaf is embedded globally.
-
Non-closed leaf paths over a base loop can still have non-trivial germs. Via the map , which is unchanged modulo under and sends horizontal paths to lines of slope , the foliation is the suspension of the translation of the circle (The circle as with basepoint , The suspension foliation of a representation of the fundamental group): its leaves are the images of in with . The base loop has a leafwise path which is not a loop in the leaf (the leaf is ), and by Suspension holonomy is the germ of the represented monodromy action its holonomy germ is the translation by , which is not the identity. So a trivial holonomy group of a leaf and a non-trivial holonomy germ of a leafwise path are compatible: the path must be closed in the leaf to represent an element of the holonomy group.
Depends on
- The holonomy representation and the holonomy group of a leaf
- The holonomy germ is independent of the foliation chart chain
- Holonomy depends only on leafwise homotopy relative to endpoints
- Existence and uniqueness of maximal connected integral manifolds
- Every nonempty convex subset of $\mathbb R^n$ is simply connected
- If $\lvert A\rvert > k\lvert B\rvert$ then every $f : A \to B$ has a fibre with more than $k$ elements, and for nonempty $B$ some fibre has at least $\lceil \lvert A\rvert / \lvert B\rvert\rceil$ elements
- The two-dimensional torus $T^2=(\mathbb R/\mathbb Z)^2$
- The quotient topology of a surjection, quotient maps, saturated sets, and the quotient of a space by an equivalence relation with its canonical projection
- Leaves of a regular foliation
- Suspension holonomy is the germ of the represented monodromy action
- The suspension foliation of a representation of the fundamental group
- The circle as $S^1=\mathbb R/\mathbb Z$ with basepoint $[0]$
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
90 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Danny Calegari, Foliations and the Geometry of 3-Manifolds (Oxford Mathematical Monographs) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Eckhard Meinrenken, Lie Groupoids and Lie Algebroids, lecture notes (University of Toronto MAT1341, Fall 2017) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Leiden NCG seminar, Noncommutative Geometry of Foliations (2023 seminar notes) (standard reference, not scraped)