How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Arc and wide-edge Khovanov-Rozansky factorizations
Definition
In the setting of Bigraded matrix factorizations with a potential, and writing a two-term factorization for as a Koszul row (the notation fixed for this construction in the sequel to this definition; the shifts are the shifts of the middle term):
(1) Oriented arc. To an oriented arc oriented from the endpoint labelled to the endpoint labelled assign the two-term factorization over , with potential ; the differentials are and , the middle term carries the bigrading shift , and both maps have bidegree . It is an object of : the square of the differential is .
(2) Wide edge. To a wide edge whose four adjacent edge labels are on its outgoing ends and on its incoming ends assign the tensor product, over , of the two Koszul rows and with potential . For a two-fold tensor product of rows the total differential satisfies with the Koszul sign convention for the totalization, so here , and the middle terms are . It is an object of .
Both assignments produce objects of with the stated potentials. Caveats: the potential of a wide edge is linear in the ; the quadratic entry enters only through the row whose first differential is ; and the shifts and are part of the definition and must be propagated exactly (Khovanov-Rozansky II, section 1, formulas (2)-(4)). Khovanov-Rozansky I, introduction printed pp. 6-8, gives the fixed- analogue with potentials and different row entries and shifts; it is not the source of these parameter- formulas.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mikhail Khovanov and Lev Rozansky, Matrix factorizations and link homology II, arXiv:math/0505056v2 (2006), section 1, formulas (2)-(4), printed pp. 2-3; published as Geom. Topol. 12 (2008) 1387-1425 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Khovanov and Rozansky, Matrix factorizations and link homology, arXiv:math/0401268v2, introduction printed pp. 6-12: fixed-n sl(n) analogue with different potentials and gradings, not the parameter-a formulas of KR II (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tina Kanstrup (notes by Corina Keller and Wai-kit Yeung), Knot homologies and matrix factorizations, ICMS summer school lecture notes (2019), Lecture 2 (standard reference, not scraped)