How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Axiom of Infinity: there is a set containing a set with no elements and closed under
Definition
The Axiom of Infinity is the sentence
of the language of set theory (The first-order language of set theory: , , formulas with parameters, and class abbreviations).
It is written here in and alone, with no abbreviations, because the notation it is usually stated in is introduced later on this page. Once that notation is available, the sentence reads: there is a set with such that implies . The first conjunct is written out, and the inner clause says exactly that is .
Remarks
-
The only unconditional existence assertion on this page. Extensionality and Foundation produce no sets at all, and every other axiom produces new sets from sets already given; this one asserts outright that a set with the two stated properties exists. Two results below say what its closure clause does: is never , since is one of its elements while (Under Foundation, for every set , there are no sets with , and there are no sets with ), and is injective (If then ).
-
Inductive sets and . A set satisfying the two conjuncts above is what Inductive set ↗ calls inductive, and the natural numbers are built at The natural numbers (von Neumann) ↗ as the smallest inductive set. Those items state the axiom in the abbreviated form; the sentence displayed above is the same assertion with the abbreviations expanded.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 1 result over 1 level. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- B. Kaya, MATH 320 Set Theory (METU), Axiom 9 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Axiom of infinity (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)