How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The basic Cohen symmetric system
Definition
Let be a transitive model of ZF, let be the finite partial maps ordered by reverse inclusion as in Cohen, collapse, and Lévy-collapse forcing orders, and let be -generic for . A finite-support permutation of acts by . Let be the resulting group of forcing automorphisms and let be generated by for finite . Conjugation sends to , so the filter is normal; every condition is supported by the finite projection of its domain to the first coordinate.
Define and the orbit-set name . Direct calculation gives and . The theorem Hereditarily symmetric interpretations form a transitive ZF model applies to the displayed , symmetric system, and -generic , so is the resulting transitive ZF model. No AC is used in this definition.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Karagila, Forcing & Symmetric Extensions, §10.4 (standard reference, not scraped)