Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedaudited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Basic degrees, exponents, and the graded coinvariant algebra of a finite Coxeter system

Definition

Let (W,S) be a Coxeter system of finite type with n=∣S∣, and let VC, ρC, S:=C[VC], R:=SW, R+=⨁d>0Rd and I:=SR+ be as in Finite linear invariant and coinvariant polynomial algebras and Complexifying a finite Coxeter reflection representation: faithfulness, complex reflections, and the hypotheses of the invariant-theory suppliers; fix coordinates x1,…,xn so that S=C[x1,…,xn] as the iterated polynomial ring of Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration, with the graded structure of Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists.

(1) Existence of a basic family. Assume the Axiom of Choice. A minimal finite family f1,…,fr of homogeneous positive-degree invariants generating the ideal I exists, generates R as a C-algebra, and is algebraically independent (Finite reflection invariant generators are algebraically independent); under the stated AC any such minimal family has exactly n elements (Chevalley shephard todd for finite weyl groups, Reflection basic invariants form a regular sequence).

(2) Degrees and exponents. Fix one such family f1,…,fn and call di:=deg⁡fithe basic degrees,ei:=di−1the exponents, arranged in nondecreasing order d1≤⋯≤dn. Each di is a positive integer, and in fact di≥2: a degree-one invariant would be a nonzero W-invariant linear form, excluded by Complexifying a finite Coxeter reflection representation: faithfulness, complex reflections, and the hypotheses of the invariant-theory suppliers (3).

(3) The graded coinvariant algebra. The coinvariant algebra of (W,VC) is the graded quotient A:=S/I=⨁k≥0Ak,Ak:=(Sk+I)/I, with A0=C (constants survive because I has positive degree), as in Finite linear invariant and coinvariant polynomial algebras. Its Hilbert series is written Hilb⁡(A,t).

(4) Well-definedness warning. This definition asserts nothing about the multiset {d1,…,dn} being independent of the chosen family, nothing about Hilb⁡(A,t) or ∏idi, and no relation between the di and the reflection geometry; all of that is the content of the justifier The basic degrees are independent of the chosen family; Hilbert series of the invariants and of the coinvariant algebra; the order formula and the Molien identity ↗.

(5) Conventions. For n=0 the group is trivial, S=R=C, I=0, A=C and the families and products are empty. For reducible S the family in (2) is the concatenation of the families of the connected components, and I is generated by all components' positive-degree invariants. No crystallographic or integrality assumption is made.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources