How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Basic degrees, exponents, and the graded coinvariant algebra of a finite Coxeter system
Definition
Let be a Coxeter system of finite type with , and let , , , , and be as in Finite linear invariant and coinvariant polynomial algebras and Complexifying a finite Coxeter reflection representation: faithfulness, complex reflections, and the hypotheses of the invariant-theory suppliers; fix coordinates so that as the iterated polynomial ring of Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration, with the graded structure of Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists.
(1) Existence of a basic family. Assume the Axiom of Choice. A minimal finite family of homogeneous positive-degree invariants generating the ideal exists, generates as a -algebra, and is algebraically independent (Finite reflection invariant generators are algebraically independent); under the stated AC any such minimal family has exactly elements (Chevalley shephard todd for finite weyl groups, Reflection basic invariants form a regular sequence).
(2) Degrees and exponents. Fix one such family and call arranged in nondecreasing order . Each is a positive integer, and in fact : a degree-one invariant would be a nonzero -invariant linear form, excluded by Complexifying a finite Coxeter reflection representation: faithfulness, complex reflections, and the hypotheses of the invariant-theory suppliers (3).
(3) The graded coinvariant algebra. The coinvariant algebra of is the graded quotient with (constants survive because has positive degree), as in Finite linear invariant and coinvariant polynomial algebras. Its Hilbert series is written .
(4) Well-definedness warning. This definition asserts nothing about the multiset being independent of the chosen family, nothing about or , and no relation between the and the reflection geometry; all of that is the content of the justifier The basic degrees are independent of the chosen family; Hilbert series of the invariants and of the coinvariant algebra; the order formula and the Molien identity ↗.
(5) Conventions. For the group is trivial, , , and the families and products are empty. For reducible the family in (2) is the concatenation of the families of the connected components, and is generated by all components' positive-degree invariants. No crystallographic or integrality assumption is made.
Depends on
- Coxeter diagrams: edges, labels, components and finite type
- The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps
- The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone
- Complexifying a finite Coxeter reflection representation: faithfulness, complex reflections, and the hypotheses of the invariant-theory suppliers
- Finite linear invariant and coinvariant polynomial algebras
- Finite reflection invariant generators are algebraically independent
- Reflection basic invariants form a regular sequence
- Chevalley shephard todd for finite weyl groups
- Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration
- Nonnegatively graded rings and modules, homogeneous elements, and twists
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
- The A₂ discriminant, its Jacobian and the top coinvariant class in ℂ[u,z]/(uz,u³+z³) Example
- The exceptional spectra for E₆ and H₃ computed exactly: characteristic polynomials, cyclotomic factorisations and the resulting degree tables Example
- The invariants and the coinvariant Hilbert series of I₂(m): an explicit computation and the noncrystallographic contrast Example
- Algebraicity of the coordinates over the invariant field and non-vanishing of the invariant Jacobian Lemma
- Exceptional parabolic-orbit length certificates for E6, E7, E8, F4, H3 and H4 Lemma
- The basic degrees are independent of the chosen family; Hilbert series of the invariants and of the coinvariant algebra; the order formula and the Molien identity Lemma
- A regular Coxeter eigenvector determines the basic degrees: the exponent-residue identification and the complete degree tables for all finite Coxeter types Theorem
- The Poincare polynomial as a product of q-integers of the basic degrees, with longest-element reciprocity Theorem
- The total degree sum, the invariant Jacobian as the discriminant, anti-invariants, and the top coinvariant class Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof, Representations of Lie Groups (MIT 18.757 course notes, 162-page PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Josh Swanson, On eigenvalues of representations of reflection groups and wreath products (University of Washington CAT seminar notes, 7-page PDF) (standard reference, not scraped)