How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Words, heaps, linear extensions, commutation classes, and fully commutative elements
Definition
Let be a finite Coxeter matrix and let be the group presented by it, with length and set of reduced expressions, so that is the order of in (Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups).
(1) Words. A word in is a finite sequence with . Its length is , it represents the element , and concatenation of words represents the product of the represented elements. A word is reduced when it is a reduced expression of the element it represents, so is the set of all reduced words representing .
(2) The heap of a word. Let be a word and put . Write when and either or (including ); thus exactly when and the pair is not a commuting pair, i.e. . Let be the reflexive transitive closure of . Every relation has , so is contained in the usual order of the positions and is antisymmetric; hence is a partial order on (Partial order and partially ordered set). The heap of is the labeled poset in which the position carries the label . Elements of a heap with the same label are pairwise comparable: if and , then .
(3) Labeled heaps and labeled isomorphism. A labeled poset is a triple in which is a finite poset and is a map. Two labeled posets and are isomorphic when there is a bijection with for all and for all . A labeled poset is a heap (for ) when it is isomorphic to for some word .
(4) Linear extensions. Let a linear extension of a finite poset be as in Linear extensions of a finite poset. For a word of length , the labeled linear extensions of are the words
(5) Commutativity classes. Two words of the same length are commutation-equivalent, written , when is obtained from by finitely many interchanges of two adjacent letters with . This is an equivalence relation on words: it is generated by the single interchanges, which are involutions, and it is by construction closed under composition. The commutativity class of is . Commutation-equivalent words have the same length, the same multiplicity of every letter, and represent the same element of : an interchange of adjacent letters with changes neither the length nor the multiplicities, and the represented element is unchanged because in whenever ; indeed, and imply (Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups).
(6) Fully commutative elements. An element is fully commutative when all its reduced words lie in a single commutativity class, that is, when for one (equivalently, every) .
(7) Abstentions and conventions. The heap is defined for an arbitrary, not necessarily reduced, word. Nothing is asserted here about the relation between and , about invariance of under commutation, or about which elements are fully commutative; those are the content of Labeled linear extensions of a heap are exactly the words in its commutativity class, and heaps classify commutativity classes ↗ and Fully commutative elements: the braid-factor criterion and the forbidden-chain heap criterion. All data are finite and no Choice is used.
Depends on
Used by
- The heap of s₁s₂s₁ in type A₂: a convex alternating chain and two commutation classes Example
- The heap of s₁s₃s₂ in type A₃: a V-shaped heap with exactly two linear extensions Example
- The right weak interval below the longest element of A₂ is not distributive Example
- Two distributive right weak intervals of fully commutative elements in type A₃ Example
- Fully commutative elements: the braid-factor criterion and the forbidden-chain heap criterion Theorem
- Labeled linear extensions of a heap are exactly the words in its commutativity class, and heaps classify commutativity classes Theorem
- The right weak order interval below a fully commutative element is the lattice of order ideals of its heap Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. R. Stembridge, On the Fully Commutative Elements of Coxeter Groups, author manuscript (March 1995, minor revisions September 1995); published in J. Algebraic Combin. 5 (1996), 353-385 (standard reference, not scraped)
- P. Nadeau, On the length of fully commutative elements, arXiv:1511.08788 (standard reference, not scraped)
- C. Krattenthaler, The theory of heaps and the Cartier-Foata monoid, appendix to the electronic reedition of P. Cartier and D. Foata, Problemes combinatoires de commutation et rearrangements (2006) (standard reference, not scraped)
- P. Cartier and D. Foata, Problemes combinatoires de commutation et rearrangements, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 85, Springer 1969; 2005 TeX reproduction with three appendices, electronic reedition 2006 (standard reference, not scraped)