Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Words, heaps, linear extensions, commutation classes, and fully commutative elements

Definition

Let (S,m) be a finite Coxeter matrix and let W be the group presented by it, with length ℓ and set R(w) of reduced expressions, so that m(s,t) is the order of st in W (Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups).

(1) Words. A word in S is a finite sequence s=(s1,…,sk) with si∈S. Its length is k, it represents the element s1⋯sk∈W, and concatenation of words represents the product of the represented elements. A word is reduced when it is a reduced expression of the element it represents, so R(w) is the set of all reduced words representing w.

(2) The heap of a word. Let s=(s1,…,sk) be a word and put [k]={1,…,k}. Write i≺sj when i<j and either si=sj or m(si,sj)≥3 (including m(si,sj)=∞); thus i≺sj exactly when i<j and the pair si,sj is not a commuting pair, i.e. m(si,sj)≠2. Let ⪯s be the reflexive transitive closure of ≺s. Every relation ≺s has i<j, so ⪯s is contained in the usual order of the positions and is antisymmetric; hence ⪯s is a partial order on [k] (Partial order and partially ordered set). The heap of s is the labeled poset Ps:=([k],⪯s) in which the position i carries the label si. Elements of a heap with the same label are pairwise comparable: if i<j and si=sj, then i≺sj.

(3) Labeled heaps and labeled isomorphism. A labeled poset is a triple (P,⪯,λ) in which (P,⪯) is a finite poset and λ:P→S is a map. Two labeled posets (P,⪯,λ) and (P′,⪯′,λ′) are isomorphic when there is a bijection φ:P→P′ with x⪯y  ⟺  φ(x)⪯′φ(y) for all x,y∈P and λ′(φ(x))=λ(x) for all x∈P. A labeled poset is a heap (for (S,m)) when it is isomorphic to Ps for some word s.

(4) Linear extensions. Let a linear extension of a finite poset be as in Linear extensions of a finite poset. For a word s of length k, the labeled linear extensions of Ps are the words L(Ps,s):={(sx1,…,sxk):(x1,…,xk) is a linear extension of Ps}.

(5) Commutativity classes. Two words s,s′ of the same length are commutation-equivalent, written s∼s′, when s′ is obtained from s by finitely many interchanges of two adjacent letters si,si+1 with m(si,si+1)=2. This is an equivalence relation on words: it is generated by the single interchanges, which are involutions, and it is by construction closed under composition. The commutativity class of s is C(s):={s′:s′∼s}. Commutation-equivalent words have the same length, the same multiplicity of every letter, and represent the same element of W: an interchange of adjacent letters with m(si,si+1)=2 changes neither the length nor the multiplicities, and the represented element is unchanged because st=ts in W whenever m(s,t)=2; indeed, s2=t2=1 and (st)2=1 imply st=(st)−1=t−1s−1=ts (Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups).

(6) Fully commutative elements. An element w∈W is fully commutative when all its reduced words lie in a single commutativity class, that is, when R(w)=C(s) for one (equivalently, every) s∈R(w).

(7) Abstentions and conventions. The heap is defined for an arbitrary, not necessarily reduced, word. Nothing is asserted here about the relation between R(w) and L(Ps,s), about invariance of Ps under commutation, or about which elements are fully commutative; those are the content of Labeled linear extensions of a heap are exactly the words in its commutativity class, and heaps classify commutativity classes ↗ and Fully commutative elements: the braid-factor criterion and the forbidden-chain heap criterion. All data are finite and no Choice is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources