How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Linear extensions of a finite poset
Definition
Let be a finite poset and write for with , the strict order of Partial order and partially ordered set. A linear extension of is a tuple that lists every element of exactly once and is such that implies that occurs before in : that is, and with .
Equivalently, a linear extension is the strict total order on the underlying set of determined by the listing, which extends ; with respect to it the whole set is a chain (Chain in a poset). For the index with is the position of in . Since a linear extension is a listing without repetitions, it has exactly entries and every element of occurs exactly once; the empty poset has the empty linear extension .
Nothing else is asserted here: in particular it is not part of the definition that a linear extension exists. For every finite poset existence is proved in Linear extensions of a finite poset: existence, prescribed initial ideals, and adjacent-swap connectivity ↗, which also shows that a prescribed order ideal can be made the initial segment of a linear extension and that any two linear extensions are connected by adjacent interchanges of incomparable elements.
Depends on
Used by
- Words, heaps, linear extensions, commutation classes, and fully commutative elements Definition
- A convex chain (in particular a covering pair) of a finite poset occurs consecutively in some linear extension Lemma
- Linear extensions of a finite poset: existence, prescribed initial ideals, and adjacent-swap connectivity Lemma
- The right weak order interval below a fully commutative element is the lattice of order ideals of its heap Theorem
Dependency tree · one level
2 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. R. Stembridge, On the Fully Commutative Elements of Coxeter Groups, author manuscript (March 1995, minor revisions September 1995); published in J. Algebraic Combin. 5 (1996), 353-385 (standard reference, not scraped)
- C. Krattenthaler, The theory of heaps and the Cartier-Foata monoid, appendix to the electronic reedition of P. Cartier and D. Foata, Problemes combinatoires de commutation et rearrangements (2006) (standard reference, not scraped)