How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Countably Infinite-Mode CAR C*-Algebra
Definition
Let be the countable mode set. For each take the universal finite-mode C*-algebra whose dense algebraic presentation is Finite-Mode Complex CAR Algebra. Identify each stage with its image in the next under the isometric inclusion of Canonical Finite-Mode CAR Inclusions Are Isometric. The inclusions are compatible, injective, and preserve the C*-norm. Their union is therefore a normed -algebra with norm whenever ; isometry makes this independent of the stage. Define the countably infinite-mode CAR C-algebra* to be the norm completion of in the sense of C star algebra. Its canonical generator is the image of the th finite-mode generator in any stage . The C*-axioms pass to the completion because each finite stage satisfies them and multiplication and involution are continuous. The universal property of this inductive-limit construction is proved in The Countable CAR Algebra Has the Universal Inductive-Limit Norm.
The existence of this particular completion needs no choice principle. Let be the occupation-basis isomorphism of The Finite-Mode CAR Algebra Is a Full Matrix Algebra, and let be the inverse image of , where . Write for coding indices, to distinguish it from the positive mode set . The theorem is countably infinite supplies a surjection , and pairing two such indices by gives an explicit enumeration of . In these coordinates the canonical inclusion is (Canonical Finite-Mode CAR Inclusions Are Isometric), so . Each finite array of Gaussian rationals is coded by a finite tuple in ; repeated pairing, followed by pairing with the stage index, enumerates without choosing from a family of stage enumerations. Entrywise approximation of real and imaginary parts by rationals (The rationals embed densely in the reals) shows Gaussian-rational matrices are dense in each finite-dimensional matrix stage: in fixed size , . Hence is dense in .
Concretely, form the set of Cauchy sequences in , identify two sequences when the norm of their termwise difference tends to zero, and use the limiting norm and termwise algebra operations. Write for the resulting completion metric. Products are well defined because Cauchy sequences are bounded and ; the involution is isometric. Thus the completion is a normed -algebra, and its C*-identity passes to limits. It is complete without Countable Choice: the constant-sequence image of is dense in the sequence-class completion, so is dense there too. Fix the explicit enumeration . For any Cauchy sequence of completion points, let be the first within of . The least-index rule defines each uniquely. The triangle inequality shows is Cauchy; for sufficiently large, is arbitrarily small, so the class is the limit of . Hence this sequence-class construction is a completion of and defines choice-free. Its canonical generators and inductive-limit norm are unchanged.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
63 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Günther Hörmann, C*-Algebras with Aspects of Quantum Physics, Chapter 6, §6.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jan Dereziński, Introduction to Representations of the Canonical Commutation and Anticommutation Relations, §§4.1 and 4.2 (standard reference, not scraped)