Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cup and cap products with local coefficients

Definition

Let R be a commutative unital ring and let L,K be left R-module local systems on X. Their objectwise tensor product is (LRK)x=LxRKx,Tγ(k)=TγTγk. The tensor relations make the displayed transport well defined; identity and composition hold on elementary tensors, and TγˉTγˉ is its inverse. Thus this is again a local system.

A local-coefficient pairing is a natural transformation b:LRKN, equivalently bilinear maps bx:Lx×KxNx satisfying Tγbx(,k)=by(Tγ,Tγk) for every path class γ:xy.

For a simplex σ:[v0,,vp+q]X, let λ0pσ be its affine edge path from v0 to vp. For φCp(X;L) and ψCq(X;K) define (φbψ)(σ)=bv0(φ(σ[0,,p]),Tλ0pσKψ(σ[p,,p+q])). The reverse transport is necessary because the back-face value lies over vp while the output cochain value must lie over v0. The Alexander--Whitney face calculation, with naturality of b on each triangular transport comparison, gives δ(φbψ)=δφbψ+(1)pφbδψ. Hence cocycles give cup products in cohomology. The same vanishing-on-front-face argument as for ordinary relative cups gives Hp(X,A;L)RHq(X,B;K)Hp+q(X,AB;N) under the usual excisive-triad comparison.

For φCp(X;L) and a local chain generator mσCn(X;K), define the cohomology-first cap product by zero when p>n and otherwise by φb(mσ)=Tλ0pσN(bv0(φ(σ[0,,p]),m))σ[p,,n]. Here forward transport is necessary because the retained back face begins at vp. The published front/back face cancellation, with the same naturality squares, yields (φbc)=(1)p(φbcδφbc). Consequently cap descends to the same relative quotient patterns as Relative cap products with quotient domains displayed, with the chain coefficient system changed from K to N in the target. In particular, Hp(X,A;L)RHn(X,A;K)Hnp(X;N), and Hp(X;L)RHn(X,A;K)Hnp(X,A;N).

If a cohomology class is represented with compact support K, cup with any ordinary class remains supported in K, while the cap of a class in Hp(X,XK;L) with a class in Hn(X,XK;K) is an absolute class. Enlargement of K commutes with the formulas, giving the compact-support cup and supportwise cap operations used in duality. Constant systems and multiplication recover the published operations. Empty spaces, zero systems or rings, p=0, p=n, and p>n follow from the displayed formulas. Only finite faces of a supplied simplex occur, so no AC is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources