How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cap product boundary identity
Statement
For , , , over a commutative unital ring, Consequently cap induces an -bilinear map Negative chain groups are zero, and no AC is assumed.
Facts & Assumptions
Cap product with cohomology written first evaluates on the front face, retains the back face, and is zero for .
Singular cochain complex with coefficients gives with positive sign.
The singular boundary operator gives the alternating face boundary and zero degree-zero boundary.
Proof
Given: as stated. By bilinearity it suffices first to check the identity on a simplex .
Assume . In , deleting vertex yields ; deleting yields . In , all terms are of the first form, now indexed by . Subtracting cancels the terms with and leaves Multiplying by gives the alternating boundary of the retained back face, with its first face having sign and subsequent signs . This is .
If , cap is a zero-chain with zero boundary; both terms on the right are zero by the degree convention. If , all terms are zero for the same reason. Step 1.1 also covers : its deleted-initial-vertex term cancels against the first term of , and the surviving term is the ordinary back-face boundary. The case was covered by . Linearity extends these calculations to all chains.
For a cocycle and cycle the boundary identity gives . If the cycle changes by , then is a boundary. If the cocycle changes by , , then applying the identity to gives , again a boundary. For there is no , since negative cochains are zero. Applying these two calculations successively covers changes in both variables; cycles and cocycles stay closed under these changes. Bilinearity descends and then factors through the tensor product.
Empty spaces, zero chains/cochains and the zero ring give zero maps. Degenerate simplex restrictions satisfy the same face identities and cancellations. Point spaces retain higher unnormalized chains, to which step 1.1 applies unchanged. The endpoint cases and zero output degrees were treated in step 2.1. Every primitive in step 3.1 is an explicit cap of the supplied or ; no arbitrary selection or AC occurs.
Depends on
Used by
- Relative cap products with quotient domains displayed Definition
- The cap-duality map of an oriented manifold Definition
- Cap product on the oriented circle Example
- Cap product and the Mayer–Vietoris duality ladder Lemma
- Cap naturality and projection formula Proposition
- Fully relative Poincaré–Lefschetz duality Theorem
- Poincaré–Lefschetz duality Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher cap boundary formula p.239; Miller Lecture 34 (standard reference, not scraped)