How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Set-length Easton-support forcing iterations
Definition
A set-length Easton-support iteration of length follows the successor rule of an ordinary forcing iteration and replaces the finite support of Finite-support forcing iterations at limit stages by Easton support. Precisely, it is the transfinite recursion (Transfinite recursion) over an ordinal of set-indexed data . For each , let be the set-sized second-name carrier specified in Finite-support forcing iterations, and require a supplied with a largest condition of the nonempty preorder . The recursion satisfies:
- is the trivial order, and is the two-step iteration of Finite-support forcing iterations, with the same carrier and the same coordinatewise order;
- at a limit , a condition is a coherent function on with , , and for every , whose non-top support meets in fewer than elements for every infinite regular (Cofinality , and regular and singular cardinals).
The order is coordinatewise in the forcing sense, as in the finite-support iteration. At the resulting order has a largest condition, the all-top function supplied by the distinguished top names. Each initial segment , including the final , is a set: at a limit it is a definable subset of the set of functions with values in the supplied carriers . The top names are part of the data, so no uniform selection of names is inferred from mere existence of forced largest conditions.
This is a different presentation from the ground-model Easton product The Easton-support product of higher Cohen forcings: the iteration's -levels are built by recursion inside the ground model and need not be isomorphic to any , and no such equivalence is asserted here. The product presentation carries the cardinal-preservation and continuum computations of this page; the iteration is recorded because the Easton support condition (15.9) of the source is stated for products of fibres and because a set-length iteration is the natural setting in which the same support bound is imposed at limit stages.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Thomas Jech, Set Theory, Chapter 15, Easton-support presentation (15.9)-(15.10), printed pp.233-234 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Kameryn J. Williams, Math 655 Lecture Notes 2.2, Definitions 51-53, PDF p.11 (standard reference, not scraped)