How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Easton-support product of higher Cohen forcings
Definition
Let be an Easton function (Easton functions on regular cardinals). A condition in the Easton-support product is a function with values in whose domain is a set of triples with , and , subject to the Easton support condition
Each coordinate carries the Cohen order (Cohen, collapse, and Lévy-collapse forcing orders), so the fibre is a partial function of domain size . A condition is stronger than , written , exactly when : stronger conditions extend functions, and the empty function is the largest condition. When is a set, is a set; when is a proper class, is a proper class and its conditions are still sets. The support condition at gives for every .
For an infinite regular (Cofinality , and regular and singular cardinals), the initial segment and the tail are the restrictions
with and . Each condition splits uniquely into these two restrictions, and each restriction retains every support bound. Conversely, a head condition and a tail condition have disjoint domains, so their union is a function. For every infinite regular , its triples with form the union of two sets each of cardinality below , which again has cardinality below . Thus union is the inverse of the map , and both maps preserve extension. This proves the isomorphism of forcing orders. is the Easton product of the fibres with , the Easton product of the fibres with , and both split by first coordinate exactly as displayed.
Depends on
Used by
- Class-theoretic ground assumptions for Easton forcing Definition
- Set-length Easton-support forcing iterations Definition
- A two-coordinate Easton pattern Example
- Easton head chain condition and tail closure Lemma
- GCH counts Easton head conditions and subset names Lemma
- Separation and Power Set in the Easton class extension Lemma
- Set-stage names and the forcing truth lemma for the Easton class product Lemma
- Uniform head-antichain decisions below a class tail Lemma
- Set-sized Easton forcing preserves cardinals and cofinalities Theorem
- Set-sized Easton realization on regular cardinals Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Thomas Jech, Set Theory, Chapter 15, conditions (15.8)-(15.12), printed pp.233-234 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Kameryn J. Williams, Math 655 Lecture Notes 2.2, Definitions 51 and 53, PDF p.11 (standard reference, not scraped)