How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An extension of a normal subgroup representation
Definition
Let be finite, , , and an irreducible complex representation. An extension of to is a representation on the same space with (A finite-dimensional representation over a field, and its degree, The sign representation of and the restriction of a representation to a subgroup). At character level an extension of is a character with .
Every extension is irreducible: any -stable subspace is -stable, so is zero or all of . Its existence implies invariance under , since intertwines the conjugate action with the original one. Extension existence is an additional hypothesis in the correspondence below.
For a representation of , its inflation to is the composite with . Conversely an -representation on which acts trivially descends uniquely to , and irreducibility is preserved in both directions, by A representation with kernel containing a normal subgroup factors through the quotient, and irreducibility is unchanged by inflation. Inflation and extension are different constructions: an extension retains the given, possibly nontrivial, -action.
Depends on
- A finite-dimensional representation $\rho:G\to \operatorname{GL}(V)$ over a field, and its degree
- The sign representation of $S_n$ and the restriction $\operatorname{Res}^G_H(V)$ of a representation to a subgroup
- A representation with kernel containing a normal subgroup factors through the quotient, and irreducibility is unchanged by inflation
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Britta Späth, Reduction theorems for some global-local conjectures — Theorem 1.3 p.2; tom Dieck Remark 4.2.5 p.57 (standard reference, not scraped)