How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
and subsets of
Definition
Let , with open and closed sets as in Open subset of (every point has a neighbourhood inside it), closed subset (complement open), and clopen.
- is an set when there is a sequence of closed subsets of with
- is a set when there is a sequence of open subsets of with
The letters are the traditional ones: for fermé with for somme, for Gebiet with for Durchschnitt.
The two classes are exchanged by complementation. is if and only if is . If with each closed, then by De Morgan, and each is open by the definition of closedness (Open subset of (every point has a neighbourhood inside it), closed subset (complement open), and clopen); the converse is the same computation read backwards, using that the complement of an open set is closed, which is again Open subset of (every point has a neighbourhood inside it), closed subset (complement open), and clopen.
Every closed set is and every open set is , by the constant sequence , respectively . As with Nowhere dense, meager (first category), residual, and second category subsets of , an at most countable family (Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable) may always be presented as a sequence: a finite list of closed sets is extended by for , and a finite list of open sets likewise, so nothing is lost by indexing over .
Remarks
-
The classes are genuinely larger than the closed and the open sets. is and is neither open nor closed, and the irrationals are and neither open nor closed; both computations are in is , meager and not , while the irrationals are , residual and not . That is not also is the first genuinely hard fact about these classes and needs the Baire category theorem (Baire category in , by nested intervals with canonically chosen rational endpoints: a countable intersection of dense open sets is dense, so is not a countable union of nowhere dense sets).
-
Why the algebra of open sets is not enough. Arbitrary unions and finite intersections of open subsets of are open, and dually for closed sets gives that a finite intersection of open sets is open and a finite union of closed sets is closed. The definitions above are exactly what one gets by relaxing "finite" to "countable" once, and the point of the whole notion is that the relaxation is proper: a countable intersection of open sets need not be open, which is is not open.
-
Nothing here is a measure-theoretic notion. and are defined from the topology of alone and are used on this page to say precisely how far and its complement sit from being closed or open. They cut across Measure zero (a countable cover by intervals of total length below every ) and content zero (a finite such cover) completely: is and has measure zero (Every at most countable subset of has measure zero), while the Smith-Volterra-Cantor set is closed, hence , and does not (The Smith-Volterra-Cantor set is compact, perfect and nowhere dense, and does not have measure zero).
Depends on
Used by
- No function ℝ → ℝ is continuous at every rational and discontinuous at every irrational, because ℚ is not G_δ Corollary
- ℚ is F_σ, meager and not G_δ, while the irrationals are G_δ, residual and not F_σ Corollary
- ℝ is the union of a meager set and a set of measure zero, so smallness of category and smallness of measure are independent notions Counterexample
- The irrationals form a residual G_δ set that is not F_σ Counterexample
- G_δ and F_σ subsets of a topological space, agreeing with the real-line notion Definition
- Every nonempty closed subset A of ℝ is the zero set of x ↦ d(x, A) and the intersection of the open sets {x : d(x,A) < 1/(n+1)}, worked for [0,1] and for {0} Example
- For every F_σ subset E of [0,1] of measure zero there is a bounded Riemann integrable function on [0,1] whose set of discontinuities is exactly E Example
- FALSE: ℚ is a G_δ subset of ℝ False statement
- Baire's theorem: a Baire class one function on a closed bounded interval [a,b] is continuous at the points of a dense subset of [a,b] that is the trace of a G_δ set, so its set of discontinuities is meager Theorem
- Every G_δ subset of ℝ is the set of continuity points of some f : ℝ → ℝ, so the G_δ sets are exactly the continuity sets Theorem
- For f : A → ℝ the set of points of A at which f is discontinuous is the intersection with A of an F_σ subset of ℝ, and the set of points at which f is continuous is the intersection with A of a G_δ subset; for A = ℝ the two sets are F_σ and G_δ outright Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 37 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Fσ set (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gδ set (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 2 and Ch. 11 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Borel set (Encyclopedia of Mathematics) (standard reference, not scraped)