How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Full and observed data under a missingness pattern
Definition
Let be a probability space and let , for a finite , be a random element of the product measurable space (Random elements and real random variables, Measurable spaces and measurable sets). The law of is the pushforward probability measure defined in Law or distribution of a random element. Let be a nonempty finite set of observation patterns with its discrete sigma-algebra, and let be a random element.
For each , specify the recorded coordinate set and its complement . The observed projection is the coordinate projection into , and the missing projection is the projection into . An empty coordinate tuple takes values in a one-point measurable space. The observed record is in the disjoint union , where a set in the disjoint-union sigma-algebra is measurable exactly when each pattern section is measurable. The pattern records which coordinates are available; it does not replace an unrecorded full-data value by zero.
Depends on
Used by
- Response-probability weighting for a sample mean Algorithm
- Location-shift pattern-mixture sensitivity function Definition
- MCAR, MAR, and MNAR relative to an observation pattern Definition
- Death is not automatically a missing outcome Example
- MCAR, MAR, MNAR, and indistinguishable observed laws Example
- Positivity failure, near-positivity weights, and an MNAR sensitivity curve Example
- Observed-data likelihood under a response model Lemma
- Exact binary-outcome bounds under unrestricted missingness Theorem
- Inverse response-probability weighting identifies the mean under MAR Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lu Mao, Missing Data: Foundations and Methods, Chapter 1, §§1.1–1.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- National Research Council, The Prevention and Treatment of Missing Data in Clinical Trials, Chapter 4, pp. 47–51 (standard reference, not scraped)