How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
MCAR, MAR, and MNAR relative to an observation pattern
Definition
Fix the full-data/observed-data partition of Full and observed data under a missingness pattern. A response mechanism is a specified conditional law of the pattern given full data , represented by a probability kernel from the full-data space to the finite pattern space (Conditional law given a random element, Measure kernel and probability kernel). In a parameterized model, write the response kernel as ; it must be a probability distribution over patterns for each full-data value.
Relative to a specified full-data law, the mechanism is missing completely at random (MCAR) when, for every pattern , is constant in almost surely. It is missing at random (MAR) when, for every pattern , there is a measurable function on that pattern's observed-data space such that For a family of full-data laws, the condition is required under each law with the same response mechanism and observed-coordinate function. It is missing not at random (MNAR) when MAR fails for at least one pattern, for the declared full-data and observed-data partition. MCAR is a special case of MAR, since a constant is a function of the observed coordinates.
These conditions concern a supplied version of the conditional law; values off the full-data model's support do not affect the classification. This definition does not assert that a response mechanism is empirically true or that every joint law comes with a selected conditional kernel.
Remarks
When the full-data and pattern spaces are standard Borel and a kernel must be obtained from a joint law rather than supplied as part of the model, the library's RCD existence and factor-through results provide that construction under AC: Existence of regular conditional distributions for standard borel targets and Regular conditional kernels factor through a standard borel conditioning variable. The finite examples on the companion page specify their response probabilities directly and do not use that existence argument.
Depends on
Used by
- Location-shift pattern-mixture sensitivity function Definition
- MCAR, MAR, MNAR, and indistinguishable observed laws Example
- Positivity failure, near-positivity weights, and an MNAR sensitivity curve Example
- Observed-data likelihood under a response model Lemma
- Exact binary-outcome bounds under unrestricted missingness Theorem
- MAR factorization and likelihood ignorability for the full-data parameter Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lu Mao, Missing Data: Foundations and Methods, Chapter 1, §§1.3–1.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- National Research Council, The Prevention and Treatment of Missing Data in Clinical Trials, Chapter 4, pp. 50–52 (standard reference, not scraped)