How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A group acting on a ring by automorphisms and its invariant subring
Definition
Let be a group (Group and abelian group) and a commutative ring. An action of on by ring automorphisms is a left action (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions), written , such that for every the map is a ring homomorphism (Ring homomorphism: additive, multiplicative, and required to send to ). Each such map is then automatically bijective, with inverse the map given by , since and likewise in the other order; so each acts as a ring automorphism, and in particular and .
The invariant subring is
It is a subring of (Subring: a subset containing and closed under addition, additive inverses and multiplication). It contains , because every acts as a unital ring homomorphism; and for and one has , and , so satisfies (T1) to (T4).
Actions by algebra automorphisms. When is a commutative -algebra with structure map (Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms), an action by -algebra automorphisms is one in which every fixes pointwise: for all and . Then , so is an -subalgebra of and whenever is a subring of .
The trivial group. If then for every , so .
Remarks
-
This agrees with the notation already in use for symmetric polynomials, and does not compete with it. Symmetric polynomials as the invariants of variable permutations lets act on by and writes for the fixed subset. That is exactly for and : the same set, under the same notation, and the definition here is the general form of it.
-
Only invariance is asked for, not any finiteness. may be infinite, and may then be small; the finiteness of is a hypothesis of the results about , not part of this definition.
Depends on
- Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms
- Group and abelian group
- Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions
- Ring homomorphism: additive, multiplicative, and required to send $1$ to $1$
- Subring: a subset containing $1_R$ and closed under addition, additive inverses and multiplication
- Symmetric polynomials as the invariants of variable permutations
Used by
- The symmetric polynomials as the invariant ring of the symmetric group, seen through Noether's finiteness theorem Example
- When the group order is invertible the Reynolds operator retracts a ring onto its invariants Example
- For a finite group of ring automorphisms the orbit polynomial is monic over the invariant subring, so the ring is integral over its invariants Lemma
- Noether's finiteness theorem: the invariants of a finite group acting on a finite-type algebra over a Noetherian ring form an algebra of finite type Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. Hochster, Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Math 614, Ch. 5 (before Theorem 5.8) (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Altman and S. Kleiman, A Term of Commutative Algebra, 13th ed., (16.22) (standard reference, not scraped)