Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Noether's finiteness theorem: the invariants of a finite group acting on a finite-type algebra over a Noetherian ring form an algebra of finite type

Statement

Let A be a Noetherian commutative ring, let C be a commutative A-algebra of finite type (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras) with A a subring of C (Subring: a subset containing 1R and closed under addition, additive inverses and multiplication), and let G be a finite group acting on C by A-algebra automorphisms (A group acting on a ring by automorphisms and its invariant subring). Then the invariant subring CG is of finite type over A.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Noetherian commutative ring A, a commutative A-algebra C of finite type with A a subring of C, and a finite group G acting on C by A-algebra automorphisms.

[L1]

For an action by ring automorphisms, CG={cC:gc=c for every gG} is a subring of C; when the action is by A-algebra automorphisms and A is a subring of C, one has ACGC (A group acting on a ring by automorphisms and its invariant subring).

[L2]

For a finite group acting by ring automorphisms on a nonzero commutative ring C, every element of C is integral over CG (For a finite group of ring automorphisms the orbit polynomial is monic over the invariant subring, so the ring is integral over its invariants).

[L3]

For commutative rings ABC, each a subring of the next, with A Noetherian, C of finite type over A and every element of C integral over B, the ring B is of finite type over A (The Artin–Tate lemma with integrality in place of module finiteness).

[L4]

An algebra is of finite type over R when it equals R[a1,,an] for some finite list, and R[] is the image of R (Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras).

[L5]

A subring contains the identity of the ambient ring and shares its zero and identity (Subring: a subset containing 1R and closed under addition, additive inverses and multiplication).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Dispose of the zero ring. If C=0 then 1C=0C, and since A is a subring of C it has the same zero and identity, so A=0; also CG=0, which is the image of A in CG and hence equals A[], an algebra of finite type over A. For the rest of the argument assume C0.

L1L4L5given
1.2

The invariant subring sits between the two: CG is a subring of C, and every gG fixes A pointwise because the action is by A-algebra automorphisms and A is a subring of C, so ACGC, each a subring of the next.

L1L5given
2.1

Since G is finite and C is nonzero, every element of C is integral over CG.

L2step 1.1
3.1

The three rings ACGC satisfy the hypotheses of the integral form of the Artin–Tate lemma: A is Noetherian, C is of finite type over A, and every element of C is integral over CG. Therefore CG is of finite type over A.

L3L4step 1.2step 2.1

Remarks

  • The theorem says finite type, and no more. It produces finitely many algebra generators of CG over A and identifies none of them; for the symmetric group acting on a polynomial ring the companion examples page compares this with the classical description by elementary symmetric polynomials, which is strictly more information.

  • Finiteness of G is used only through For a finite group of ring automorphisms the orbit polynomial is monic over the invariant subring, so the ring is integral over its invariants, and there it is essential: it is what makes the orbit polynomial a polynomial.

  • No hypothesis on the characteristic, and no invertibility of G. The route through integrality and the Artin–Tate lemma avoids averaging entirely, which is why nothing here breaks when the order of G is not invertible in C.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources