Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Lee-deformed Khovanov complex and filtration

Definition

Let D be a finite regular oriented link diagram in the standard oriented 3-sphere. Use the oriented Khovanov resolution cube, crossing order, signs, and shifts fixed in the integral Khovanov construction. Over Q, replace its circle algebra by AL=Q[X]/(X2−1), with deg⁡q(1)=1 and deg⁡q(X)=−1, and structure maps

ηL(1)=1,ϵL(1)=0,ϵL(X)=1, mL(1⊗1)=1,mL(1⊗X)=mL(X⊗1)=X,mL(X⊗X)=1, ΔL(1)=1⊗X+X⊗1,ΔL(X)=1⊗1+X⊗X.

For a resolution state v with k(v) circles, assign AL⊗k(v) and cohomological degree i(v)=∣v∣−n−. On a tensor basis element whose circle labels are a1,…,ak(v)∈{1,X}, set

q(v;a1,…,ak(v))=∣v∣+n+−2n−+∑j=1k(v)deg⁡q(aj).

The differential is the signed sum of the edge maps mL and ΔL. The resulting finite cochain complex is the Lee-deformed Khovanov complex CL(D;Q). Its decreasing quantum filtration FpCL(D;Q) is spanned by basis elements of quantum degree at least p. Its homology with the induced filtration is the Lee homology of the diagram. The diagram-level definition does not by itself assert invariance under changing D.

For the empty link diagram, use its single empty resolution state and empty tensor term Q in cohomological and quantum degree 0, with zero differential. Its induced decreasing filtration is FpCL(∅;Q)=Q for p≤0 and FpCL(∅;Q)=0 for p>0.

The two equal composites in the diagram below are the Frobenius compatibility maps used on merge-split faces. The drawing names maps only; the proof checks the equality on the basis {1,X}⊗2.

AL¬ALALAL¬AL¬ALAL¬ALmL¢L¬id¢Lid¬mL

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite regular oriented diagram D, an ordering of its crossing set, and the coefficient field Q.

[F1]

The normalized Khovanov cube uses a finite state set, the state degree ∣v∣−n−, the quantum shift ∣v∣+n+−2n−, and a cube sign that reverses on opposite routes around each square face. (Khovanov Frobenius algebra and cube of resolutions)

[F2]

A cochain complex has a degree-+1 differential whose square is zero. (Cochain complex in an abelian category)

Proof

Given: The finite oriented resolution cube of D and the operations in the Definition.

Empty-link case: For D=∅, the state set is the singleton empty function, its empty tensor term is Q in degrees (0,0), and there are no edges. The differential is zero and the degree-zero generator gives exactly the filtration stated in the Definition. Assume henceforth that D is nonempty for the remaining checks.

1.1givenalgebra

The quotient AL=Q[X]/(X2−1) has basis 1,X, and its multiplication table is the displayed mL. Hence multiplication is associative and commutative with unit 1. The counit identities follow on 1,X: (ϵL⊗id)ΔL(1)=1, (ϵL⊗id)ΔL(X)=X, and the other counit composite gives the same values.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

For input 1, both composites (ΔL⊗id)ΔL and (id⊗ΔL)ΔL equal 1⊗X⊗X+X⊗1⊗X+1⊗1⊗1+X⊗X⊗1. For input X, both equal 1⊗1⊗X+1⊗X⊗1+X⊗1⊗1+X⊗X⊗X. Thus ΔL is coassociative. Cocommutativity follows by swapping tensor factors in its two displayed values.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

On the ordered basis 1⊗1,1⊗X,X⊗1,X⊗X, each of (mL⊗id)(id⊗ΔL), ΔLmL, and (id⊗mL)(ΔL⊗id) has outputs 1⊗X+X⊗1, 1⊗1+X⊗X, 1⊗1+X⊗X, and 1⊗X+X⊗1. The Frobenius identities therefore hold. On a cube square, two changes on disjoint circles commute by tensor functoriality; two merges give the same composite by associativity of mL; two splits give the same composite by coassociativity of ΔL; and a merge-split pair gives the same composite by the Frobenius identities just checked. In each case the cube signs on the two routes are opposite, so the square contribution to dL2 is zero. Every length-two path in the cube lies in one such square, so summing over squares proves dL2=0.

4.1F1F2step 3.1algebra∎

The terms of mL and ΔL inherited from Q[X]/(X2) have total quantum degree 0 after the state shift. The new multiplication term mL(X⊗X)=1 changes the label degree from −2 to 1, and the edge state shift adds 1, so it raises q by 4. The new term 1⊗1 in ΔL(X) changes label degree from −1 to 2, and its edge state shift again adds 1, so it raises q by 4. Thus every differential term preserves or raises q, making each FpCL a subcomplex. The state set and each state module are finite, so only finitely many q-degrees occur and the filtration is finite. All algebra and cube checks use finite bases and no choice axiom.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources