How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Morse numbers and the Morse polynomial
Definition
Let be a closed smooth -manifold (Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right) and let be a Morse function (Morse functions and excellent Morse functions). Write for the set of critical points of (Critical points and critical values of a smooth function) and for the index of a nondegenerate critical point (Nondegenerate critical points, nullity, index, and coindex). For every integer the Morse number of in degree is
Each is a finite nonnegative integer, and unless . The Morse polynomial of is a polynomial with nonnegative integer coefficients and .
The index is the number of negative squares of the Hessian in the library's convention (Nondegenerate critical points, nullity, index, and coindex). The definition is purely geometric: no field, coefficient ring, or orientation enters, and the empty and zero-dimensional cases are included.
Remarks
- Well-definedness. Finiteness of each is A Morse function on a compact manifold has finitely many critical points: a Morse function on a compact manifold has only finitely many critical points, so the displayed cardinality is a nonnegative integer. The index of a nondegenerate critical point is an integer in because it is the number of negative squares of a symmetric bilinear form on the -dimensional space (Nondegenerate critical points, nullity, index, and coindex); this is why the sum defining is finite and why has degree at most .
- Conventions. A Morse function on a closed manifold is a Morse function in the sense of Morse functions and excellent Morse functions on a compact manifold without boundary; no excellent condition is required here. The zero-dimensional case is the case of a finite set of points, where and .
- The Morse numbers depend only on , not on any field; the -Betti numbers compared with them below do depend on the coefficient field (Poincare polynomial of a space and of a pair over a field).
Depends on
- Morse functions and excellent Morse functions
- Nondegenerate critical points, nullity, index, and coindex
- Critical points and critical values of a smooth function
- A Morse function on a compact manifold has finitely many critical points
- Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts
- Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
Used by
- Morse Euler characteristic identity Corollary
- Strong Morse inequalities Corollary
- Total critical point lower bound Corollary
- Weak Morse inequalities Corollary
- Euler equality alone does not imply perfectness Counterexample
- Perfect Morse function over a field Definition
- A created cancelling pair contributes a (1+t)tᵏ term Example
- A Morse function on the torus is perfect over every field Example
- Real projective space shows coefficient-dependent perfectness Example
- The height function on a sphere is perfect Example
- Morse inequalities and perfectness depend on the coefficient field Remark
- Morse polynomial identity Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Liviu Nicolaescu, An Invitation to Morse Theory (2nd ed.), Chapter 2 Section 2.3, printed pp. 46-53 (PDF pp. 56-63) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michele Audin and Mihai Damian, Morse Theory and Floer Homology, Part I Chapter 4 Section 4.4, printed pp. 88-91 (PDF pp. 98-100) (standard reference, not scraped)