How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Perfect Morse function over a field
Definition
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be a closed smooth -manifold, let be a Morse function and let be a field (Field). Write for the Morse numbers and for the Morse polynomial of (Morse numbers and the Morse polynomial), and for the -Betti numbers with Poincare polynomial (Poincare polynomial of a space and of a pair over a field).
Then is -perfect, or perfect over , when equivalently (The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution).
Perfectness is always understood with respect to a field: it may hold over one field and fail over another when has torsion. No orientation of and no Morse-Smale condition is required by the definition.
Remarks
- Equivalent forms. Since a polynomial over is determined by its coefficient sequence, the identity holds exactly when for every ; both polynomials have nonnegative integer coefficients and are zero in degrees outside , so no degree-range correction is hidden.
- What perfectness asserts. It is equality in every weak Morse inequality at once; equivalently, it is the vanishing of the correction polynomial of the Morse polynomial identity proved later on this page.
- Existential status. The definition names a property of a pair ; it asserts nothing about existence, and it does not require to be excellent.
Depends on
Used by
- Total critical point lower bound Corollary
- Euler equality alone does not imply perfectness Counterexample
- A Morse function on the torus is perfect over every field Example
- Real projective space shows coefficient-dependent perfectness Example
- The height function on a sphere is perfect Example
- Perfectness, vanishing correction, and vanishing handle boundaries Lemma
- Morse inequalities and perfectness depend on the coefficient field Remark
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Liviu Nicolaescu, An Invitation to Morse Theory (2nd ed.), Chapter 2 Section 2.3, printed pp. 46-53 (PDF pp. 56-63) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michele Audin and Mihai Damian, Morse Theory and Floer Homology, Part I Chapter 4 Section 4.4, printed pp. 88-91 (PDF pp. 98-100) (standard reference, not scraped)